Summary of Key Points
This news article compares the successful escort missions conducted by the Reagan administration in the 1980s through the Operation Earnest Will in the Strait of Hormuz with the current Trump administration's reluctance to directly enter the Persian Gulf, opting instead for a remote blockade via the Gulf of Oman. It analyzes five core reasons behind this change and also discusses the added asymmetrical pressure posed by the widespread availability of missiles, as well as the chaotic decision-making within the Trump team. In short, the United States was able to conduct escort missions in the past due to its neutral status, substantial military strength, and the fact that its adversaries were unprepared; however, today it hesitates because of the potential for direct conflict, a well-prepared enemy, reduced military capabilities, a less desirable mission objective, and the significant threat posed by missiles.
Detailed Analysis
1. From “Neutral Assistance” to “Direct Conflict”: A Dramatic Change in Risk
During the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s, the United States merely escorted Kuwaiti oil tankers under its flag without engaging in direct combat with Iran. Iran had no reason to provoke the U.S., as it had only accidentally damaged one American warship at that time. However, the situation is different now: The U.S. has pushed Iran to a critical point through sanctions and attempts to assassinate its leaders, making it a direct adversary. Iran no longer holds back and will use any means necessary for retaliation, such as launching missiles at American vessels. This is like the difference between mediating a dispute for a friend and fighting the conflict yourself—the enemy's attitude towards you is vastly different, thus doubling the risks.
2. Iran Has Been Preparing for 20 Years, While the U.S. Relys on Past Successes
After the Gulf War in the 1990s, the U.S. stationed troops in neighboring countries (Iraq and Afghanistan), giving Iran ample time to prepare for a potential attack. Over the past 20 years, Iran has amassed a large number of missiles, built robust defensive facilities, and dispersed its command structures to avoid being easily eliminated by the U.S. military. In contrast, the U.S. continues to use the same tactics from the Gulf War 30 years ago or the Iraq War 20 years ago, with so-called “AI enhancements” merely improving efficiency rather than introducing new strategies. It’s like using old techniques against an opponent who has trained for 20 years; such a mismatch makes it much riskier for the U.S. to take action.
3. The Decline of the U.S. Navy’s Military Strength
At the end of the Cold War in the 1980s, the U.S. Navy had approximately 600 ships, many of which were inexpensive frigates designed for hazardous escort duties. Losing a few of these ships was not a major concern. Today, the U.S. Navy has only 293 vessels, consisting mainly of expensive aircraft carriers and destroyers (each costing over one billion dollars). Damaging even just one of these would be a significant loss. Moreover, the U.S. shipbuilding industry has declined, making it difficult to repair or replace damaged ships. As a result, the Navy is reluctant to send these expensive vessels into the Persian Gulf and prefers to conduct remote blockades.
4. Escort Missions Are a Demanding and Unappreciated Task
The ideal role of the navy is to engage in major battles (such as naval warfare), while escort missions are seen as mundane and unglorious. Success in these tasks goes unnoticed, and any accidents (such as ship bombings) result in criticism. Historically, no general has been promoted for outstanding performance in escort duties, indicating that these long-term, low-intensity missions are not the U.S. Navy’s forte. Both officers and sailors resist them, and commanders avoid taking responsibility, leading to a general lack of enthusiasm for such assignments.
5. The Proliferation of Missiles Gives Iran an Asymmetrical Advantage
Missiles, which were once a luxury in the 1980s, have become widely available today. For Iran, they represent the only weapon capable of threatening the U.S. With a mere investment of one million missiles, Iran can confront the U.S.’s billion-dollar aircraft carriers with just three million interceptors. This asymmetrical disparity places significant economic pressure on the U.S., as Iran has a larger missile stockpile while the U.S. faces limited interceptor capabilities. The U.S. views missiles as a supplementary weapon, whereas Iran treats them as a core component of its defense, making it more hesitant to engage in combat.
Additional Note: The Chaotic Decision-Making of the Trump Team
The article mentions that the Trump administration’s decision-making process is chaotic, with leaders distracted by non-military issues (such as the renovation of banquet halls). Those within the team who opposed war were excluded, leaving only those inclined to take a tough line. As a result, the Pentagon has no choice but to implement poorly thought-out plans without anyone daring to challenge them. This lack of professional expertise and reliability in decision-making is another reason why the U.S. is cautious about taking action.
In summary, the current U.S. no longer possesses the neutral status or military advantages it did in the past. Faced with a well-prepared Iran and the threat of asymmetrical missiles, it relies on relatively safe methods like remote blockades rather than direct escort missions as it did in the 1980s.
(End of translation)