虎嗅

Japan Has Lost Its Lead; South Korea Has Taken the Top Spot. Can China Copy Their Dominance in Data Storage?

原文:日本失守、韩国登顶,中国能复制存储霸权吗?

Summary of Key Points

The “throne” of the global storage industry has never been firmly held by a single entity for long: from Japan’s dominance in the 1980s, to South Korean companies overtaking them later on, and now Chinese storage firms are rapidly rising thanks to technological breakthroughs and capacity expansion. The traditional tripartite division of the market among Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron is being reshaped, marking a new phase in the battle for dominance.

1. The Rotation of Storage Industry Leaders: From Japan to South Korea

The position of industry leader is like a hot potato that no one wants to hold for too long. In the 1980s, Japanese companies (such as Toshiba, NEC, and Hitachi) were the absolute dominators in the global storage market, with DRAM (memory used in computers and smartphones) accounting for over 80% of the market share. However, in the 1990s, South Korean companies like Samsung and SK Hynix turned the situation around through heavy investment and the ability to withstand losses. For example, Samsung continued to invest heavily in DRAM technology and did not give up even after ten consecutive years of losses, eventually catching up with Japan in 1993 and becoming the global leader by 2000. Japanese companies gradually lost their advantage due to higher costs and slower responses, and withdrew from the mainstream storage market.

2. The Rise of Chinese Storage: How Can They Challenge the Status Quo?

Chinese companies are able to challenge the existing landscape thanks to a combination of three key factors: technological breakthroughs, policy support, and market demand:

  • Technological Catch-up: Changjiang Memory’s 3D NAND (flash memory used in smartphones and computers) technology has progressed from 64 layers to 128 layers, and now to 232 layers, putting it on par with Samsung and Micron. Changxin Memory has also achieved mass production of 19nm DRAM, breaking foreign monopolies.
  • Policy Support: The National Integrated Circuit Industry Fund (a significant government investment initiative) provides continuous support for research and development and capacity expansion. Local governments offer land and tax incentives to encourage companies to invest in technology.
  • Market Demand: The domestic demand for storage, especially in smartphones, data centers, and large AI models, gives Chinese companies a competitive advantage. For instance, Changjiang Memory’s flash memory is already supplied to brands like Huawei and Xiaomi.

3. Changing the Status Quo: New Players Disrupting the Storage Market

The global storage market was previously divided among three major players: Samsung (South Korea) with around 35%, SK Hynix (South Korea) with 25%, and Micron (United States) with 20%. Now, Chinese companies’ share is rising rapidly. Changjiang Memory’s NAND flash memory market share has reached 10%, and Changxin Memory’s DRAM production has also surpassed 5%. This indicates a shift towards a “four-polar” landscape (South Korea, the United States, and China), with the potential for more players to enter in the future. Changjiang Memory aims to hold 15% of the global NAND market by 2025, while Changxin Memory’s DRAM production is doubling, directly threatening the market shares of Samsung and Micron.

4. The Deep Reason Why the Throne Remains Unstable: Rapid Technological Evolution

The core of the storage industry is a constant “race to innovate.” Every 1-2 years, there is a new technological advancement that requires substantial investment in research and development and capacity expansion. Japan failed to keep up with these changes; South Korea maintained its lead by continuous investment, while China has now caught up. Storage is also a sector where scale matters significantly—greater production capacity leads to lower costs, giving Chinese companies a competitive advantage due to their rapid expansion.

5. The连锁 Reactions of the Changing Landscape: Who Benefits and Who Is Concerned?

  • Chinese Consumers and Companies: With the rise of domestic storage providers, prices are expected to decrease, and there will be less risk of supply disruptions (such as during U.S. sanctions).
  • South Korean and American Companies: Increased competition may force them to lower prices or accelerate research and development efforts. For example, Samsung recently announced increased investment in 3D NAND technology, and Micron is expanding production to maintain its market share.
  • The Global Supply Chain: China’s role as a major supplier has changed the supply chain structure, with international brands like Apple and Dell beginning to purchase Chinese storage products, reducing their dependence on South Korea and the United States.

In summary, the battle for dominance in the storage industry continues. The rise of Chinese companies is not accidental but results from a combination of technological advancements, policy support, and market demand. Who will ultimately sit on the throne? It will depend on who can keep up with technological developments and maintain their cost and scale advantages. One thing is clear: the storage market is no longer dominated by just two companies, South Korea and the United States.