Summary of the Key Points
This article reveals a common phenomenon in society through two examples: Zhong Shu’s rise to fame followed by accusations of plagiarism, and the success of “Niulai” due to public sentiment and the psychological boost during a bull market. People’s evaluations of individuals and events are increasingly detached from their true value—whether it’s Zhong Shu’s professional competence or the quality of “Niulai’s” film. Instead, these judgments are influenced by the emotions, needs, and perspectives of onlookers. This misalignment in evaluation leads to confusion about what is valuable and how to live, but it also provides creators with an opportunity to be unbound by conventional norms, as no one truly cares about the “authenticity” of their work; they can find their own place in a world of chaos.
Detailed Analysis
1. Fame (or failure) has nothing to do with intrinsic quality
Zhong Shu’s popularity wasn’t due to her actual academic excellence but rather her image of being a “high-end cultural figure” (her professional demeanor during interviews, her way of citing theories). The subsequent criticism of plagiarism wasn’t about the standards for determining originality or who the rights holders were; it was more about people wanting to play the role of judges. The high box office success of “Niulai” wasn’t because of its quality as an animation but because investors saw it as a sign of a bull market, buying it for emotional comfort and to join in the excitement. Both events’ success or failure were driven by附加 emotions and societal demands, not their inherent value.
2. We all use others as tools
Zhong Shu became popular because many people wanted her to represent them; she embodied the “academic image” they aspired to. The criticism was a way for some to prove their expertise or sense of justice. “Niulai” gained support because investors needed a symbol of hope during a bull market. In essence, people used her and the film to express their emotions and fulfill their needs, much like buying wife cakes on Qixi Festival—not for the taste but for the romantic association. It’s not the products themselves that matter; we often blame others for not meeting our expectations.
3. The confusion of ordinary people
When evaluations deviate from reality, people feel lost: Is my lack of success due to lack of effort or a lack of rebellion? Am I not mainstream enough or too unconventional? Parents struggle to find role models for their children because today’s stars may be criticized tomorrow, and those criticized might become popular again. In the past, there was a clear path to success: study hard → get a good job → achieve success. Now, the path is unclear, leading to anxiety.
4. Is a chaotic world a bad thing? It could be an opportunity for creators
The article suggests that a chaotic society (like the Six Dynasties or Yuan Dynasty) can be culturally vibrant. For creators, it means they don’t have to conform to standards and can pursue their passions in a less scrutinized environment. Many niche creators succeed today not because they fit traditional aesthetics but because they find their unique voice.
5. The truth of our times: We’re focusing on the trappings rather than the essence
The article compares society to eating “seasonings” (superficial aspects) rather than the “true flavor.” People focus on superficial qualities like Zhong Shu’s academic image or “Niulai’s” association with a bull market, not on the substance. Success and failure both depend on these trappings. However, this leads to confusion about what is genuine, leaving people to follow the crowd or join in extreme reactions.
This article warns us against being misled by surface noise and emotions, encouraging us to consider the essence of things. But if we’re at a loss, there’s no need to worry: creators have opportunities in a chaotic world, and for ordinary people, staying clear-headed and not relying too heavily on others can lead to a more peaceful life.