第一财经

The U.S. Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve took "opposite actions" on the same day, changing the global logic of asset pricing.

原文:美财政部与美联储同日“反向操作”,全球资产定价逻辑生变

Summary of Key Points

When U.S. Treasury yields soared to almost uncontrollable levels, the U.S. Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve issued opposing signals on the same day: the Treasury Department tried to lower long-term bond rates by increasing the purchase of long-term Treasurys (acting as a "brake"), while the Fed hinted that it might continue to raise interest rates in the future (leaving the door open for further hikes). These contrasting actions led to a short-term rebound in global markets (a surge in gold prices, and gains in U.S. and Asian stock markets). However, industry experts generally believe this is just a temporary recovery, not a reversal of trend—since the United States' $40 trillion debt problem remains unresolved, and the Fed's hawkish stance has not changed, meaning long-term asset pricing pressures persist.

Detailed Analysis

1. What are the Treasury Department's "braking" measures and the Fed's "leaving the door open" for hikes?

  • The Treasury Department's actions: Essentially, the government is buying back long-term Treasurys with maturities of 10-30 years, doubling the scale of these purchases (from $2 billion to $4 billion per transaction). Why? Because long-term bond yields had risen excessively, and there was little interest from the market in buying them, leading to a near-dry-up of liquidity. By purchasing more Treasurys, the supply decreases, driving up their prices and thus lowering yields (bond prices and yields are inversely related).
  • The Fed's "leaving the door open" for hikes: July meeting minutes show that although no rate hike was implemented this time, many officials believe that further hikes may be necessary if inflation does not decline. In fact, three voting members explicitly suggested a 25-basis-point increase. The message is: "I'm pausing for now, but I'm not completely giving up on raising rates; if inflation doesn't behave as expected, I will act again."
  • The contradiction between the two: The Treasury Department aims to lower long-term interest rates, while the Fed focuses on short-term rates (as rate hikes affect the short term). This means one is pulling down and the other is pushing up, requiring a re Adjustment of global asset pricing logic.

2. Why did markets suddenly surge?

  • Gold prices skyrocketed: Gold, being an interest-free asset, saw its opportunity cost decrease as long-term bond yields fell. Investors flocked to buy gold, driving its price up by 4.35% to over $4,500 per ounce.
  • U.S. stock markets rebounded: Lower long-term bond yields reduced the cost of corporate borrowing for long-term funding. As a result, the three major U.S. stock indices ended their three-day decline with slight gains.
  • Asian markets also rose: The Nikkei index rose 1.4%, the South Korean KOSPI gained more than 5%, and Chinese A-shares opened higher. Global markets are interconnected; when the U.S. market stabilized, Asian investors felt relieved, and capital flowed into these markets.

3. Why is this just a temporary recovery, not a trend reversal?

Industry experts argue for several reasons:

  • The Treasury Department's purchases are not equivalent to "printing money": Unlike the Fed's previous quantitative easing (QE) programs, these purchases do not increase the money supply and thus have limited impact on market liquidity. They mainly serve as a signal to the market that the government does not want long-term bond yields to rise too much.
  • The Fed remains hawkish: As long as inflation does not reach the 2% target, the possibility of rate hikes exists. If markets start expecting further hikes, the dollar and short-term rates could rise again, putting pressure on global financing costs.
  • The debt problem persists: The U.S. government will still need to borrow $3.5 trillion in the coming years, increasing the supply of long-term Treasurys and likely driving yields back up eventually.

4. The magnitude of the $40 trillion debt problem:

  • Record-breaking debt level: The U.S. currently owes $40 trillion, meaning each American owes approximately $12,000 in debt (about 85,000 RMB). This figure is still rising.
  • Decline in foreign interest in U.S. Treasurys: For the first time in three years, the amount of U.S. Treasurys purchased by overseas investors (such as central banks and private institutions) has decreased by more than 40%. Without buyers, the government must offer higher yields to attract them, which could push up long-term bond rates.
  • Fierce competition for funds: Companies are also issuing bonds, competing with the government for capital. For example, corporate bond issuance surged in June, forcing the government to compete with companies and further driving up interest rates.

5. The long-term impact on global assets:

The yield on 30-year U.S. Treasurys serves as a benchmark for pricing global assets. When this yield rises, the cost of borrowing in dollars increases—whether for corporate loans, mortgages, or for emerging countries. Despite the short-term rebound, long-term pressures remain due to high debt levels, ongoing hike expectations, and fierce competition for funds.

Final Conclusion

This policy intervention is like giving a feverish market an antipyretic; it temporarily cools down, but the underlying issues (debt and inflation) are still there, and problems may recur in the future. Investors should not be misled by short-term gains and should focus on long-term trends.