虎嗅

What kind of "university" do college students who complain about their campus being located in a county town actually want?

原文:吐槽校区在县城里的大学生,到底想要一所怎样的“大学”?

Summary of the Key Points

This article focuses on the complaints of college students about the conditions of their universities, highlighting issues such as remote and small campuses, poor accommodation, and chaotic open management. These complaints stem from a misunderstanding of the nature of public universities: public universities are a form of social welfare, funded by the state and taxpayers, and the tuition fees paid by students are far from covering the actual costs. The "ideal university" that students envision—located in the city center with luxurious accommodation and exclusive services—is not only unrealistic but also goes against the principles of public resource allocation. It reflects a misconception that high exam scores grant privileges; however, exam scores are merely entry tickets, not proof of entitlement to such benefits, and once students leave campus, no one else will bear the cost of these ideals.

Detailed Analysis

1. Is Your "Ideal University" Really a "High-End, Closed Elite Community"?

On the contrary, the standards that students have for an ideal university include a prime location in the city center (with convenient access to cafes, cinemas, and shopping areas), a vast campus (with beautiful scenery like a tourist attraction), strict access control (only allowing insiders), and top-notch facilities (four-person rooms with private bathrooms and air conditioning/heating), as well as luxurious admission letters (including creative gift boxes). But when you put all these elements together, does this sound like a public university? It sounds more like an exclusive community surrounded by high walls, where students enjoy exclusive privileges while the general public serves as a backdrop. Forcing access control turns public resources into a private domain for students. The desire for a city center location and luxury accommodation comes at an exorbitant cost that most taxpayers cannot afford. This kind of ideal is akin to the privileges enjoyed by certain castes in India.

2. Where Does the Money for Public Universities Come From? Your Tuition Fees Are Far from Enough

The annual tuition for a public undergraduate program in China ranges from 4,000 to 6,000 yuan, with additional accommodation costs of over 1,000 yuan. With this amount, you can barely afford a one-bedroom apartment in a city center for a month. However, in return, you gain access to year-round use of teaching buildings, a library with millions of books, state-of-the-art laboratories, instruction from dozens of teachers, and support for sports and other facilities. The truth is that your tuition fees cover only a fraction of the actual costs of educating you. The majority of the funding comes from the state budget—taxpayer money used to build campuses, hire professors, and subsidize your tuition. For example, the annual salary of a full professor, along with research funding, is several times higher than your tuition fees, and the land and construction costs for a university campus can be astronomical. The benefits you receive are supported by the entire society, not earned through your exam scores.

3. Why Are Campuses Located in Suburbs or Counties?

Students may dislike the fact that campuses are in suburban or county areas, but this is a matter of cost and fairness. The land value in city centers is several times higher than in rural areas, so with the same budget, only a fraction of the students can be enrolled. By building campuses in the suburbs, more students from lower-income families can attend top-tier universities. For instance, if all prestigious universities were concentrated in the city center, your exam scores might not be enough to get in. The trade-off between convenience and fairness is necessary.

4. Misconception: Exam Scores Are Not a Proof of Privilege

Many students think that high scores entitle them to the best everything, but this is a misconception. Exam scores are just a means of selection, not a proof of entitlement. They do not generate income, build infrastructure, or create value; they merely provide temporary access to educational resources. For example, you may complain about the lack of air conditioning in your dorm, but the cost of such facilities would be prohibitive outside of university. You may also think the campus is too small, but the maintenance of a large campus requires significant funding that you cannot afford. Expecting the same standards as elite schools while enjoying subsidized benefits creates an illusion of privilege.

5. You'll Realize How Privileged Your University Life Really Is Once You Graduate

When students complain, they often overlook the underlying logic of society. After graduation, you'll realize how fortunate you are with low tuition, affordable accommodation, and free public resources in a relatively enclosed environment. Once you step into the real world, you'll have to pay for rent, commute for hours, and face the complexities of society. The "poor conditions" of university life are actually a form of welfare provided by the entire community.

Final Thoughts

It's okay to criticize practical issues like inconvenient commutes and poor accommodation, but before doing so, consider how much you've paid and whose resources you're benefiting from. Expecting exclusive services based on your fantasies will only lead to resentment towards society. Remember, university is the first step into the workplace, and the first lesson is that there are no inherent privileges; all benefits come from the support of society. Complain if you must, but don't delude yourself into thinking you're being treated unfairly. Once you graduate, you'll appreciate how precious the current experience is.