虎嗅

As the world becomes increasingly chaotic, how do shipping companies manage to make a profit?

原文:世界越来越乱,航运公司靠什么挣钱?

Summary of Key Points

Maersk went from incurring a loss of $192 million in its maritime business in the first quarter of this year to making a profit of $935 million in the second quarter. The annual forecast has also been revised from a minimum loss of $1.5 billion to at least a profit of $4.5 billion. On the surface, this is driven by rising freight rates, but the underlying reasons lie in the company's organizational agility, decision-making speed, and ability to adjust resources. The core principle is that “the greater the storm, the more expensive the fish become—provided the ship can make it back.” Companies need a solid “ship’s hull” (a strong financial balance sheet), a continuous “source of power” (a stable business model), and a “captain’s system” (effective organizational capabilities) to turn uncertainty into profit in times of high volatility.

I. Performance Turnaround: Not Thanks to the Market, but to the Company’s Quick Response

Many people think Maersk’s success is due to rising freight rates, but the key is its ability to rapidly respond to market changes.

  • Data Comparison: The company lost $192 million in the first quarter but made a profit of $935 million in the second quarter, with freight rates increasing by 22% and ship utilization reaching 96%. The annual forecast changed from a potential loss of $1.5 billion to at least a profit of $4.5 billion within just three months, a change that defies traditional cyclical logic.
  • CEO Soren Kovensgaard says this is not luck, but the result of years of developing fast decision-making skills, such as streamlining approval processes, ensuring that frontline information reaches headquarters quickly, and being able to adjust routes and resources promptly. For example, when exports to the Far East surged and port congestion increased, Maersk was able to reallocate ships and raise prices faster than its competitors, seizing the opportunity.
  • Essence: The market is the “wind,” and the company is the “ship.” Only those ships that respond quickly can take advantage of the wind; those that are slow may not even make it through the storm.

II. The Truth Behind “The Greater the Storm, the More Expensive the Fish”: It’s About Surviving, Not Taking Risks

This saying is often misunderstood as meaning that taking risks will lead to big profits, but it’s based on the premise that the ship must be able to return.

  • Metaphor: Out of 100 fishing boats in a storm, only 10 make it back, and the market price of fish increases due to reduced supply. The other 90 boats sink, never even reaching the fish.
  • Three Essential Abilities:

1. A Strong Hull: A company’s financial balance sheet (e.g., having enough cash from previous profits and the ability to borrow when needed).

2. Sustainable Power: Stable customer demand and a robust business model (e.g., Maersk’s core maritime business, along with diversified revenue from logistics and terminals).

3. A Capable Captain: Management that can gather information quickly and assess situations (e.g., anticipating port congestion and detouring in advance).

  • Conclusion: The storm itself is not the opportunity; the ability to survive the storm is what creates the opportunity.

III. The Four Skills of an Excellent “Captain”: How to Catch Fish in Turbulent Times

Maersk’s “captain’s system” is not a single individual but a set of organizational capabilities, focusing on four key skills:

1. Identifying Changes Hidden in Data: For example, the difference between “nominal capacity” and “effective capacity.” Even if a company claims to have 100 ships, if ports are congested, only 80 may be available for use, and these 80 determine the price. Maersk can detect reductions in effective capacity in advance.

2. Making Decisions Without Waiting for Complete Information: The market won’t wait for you to gather all data before raising prices. For instance, if the Strait of Hormuz might be blocked, Maersk will adjust routes and negotiate price increases with customers before the issue occurs.

3. Turning Risks into Opportunities: A blockage in the Strait of Hormuz increases costs (e.g., fuel for detours), but it also opens up new opportunities, such as shifting cargo to land routes (e.g., via land bridges to Europe) and increasing logistics revenue.

4. Having the Right Tools to Adapt: Maersk is not just a shipping company; it also owns terminals, warehouses, and land transport services. This flexibility allows it to respond to changes effectively.

IV. The Changing Competition: From “Who Runs Faster” to “Who Delivers More Reliably”

In the past, the shipping industry focused on efficiency (larger ships, lower costs). Now, the focus is on predictability: Customers want to ensure they receive their goods on time, not just the lowest shipping cost.

  • Example: If the Red Sea is blocked, customers don’t care about the price increase; they only care about timely delivery. Maersk’s multiple port and land transport options ensure delivery, allowing it to charge more.
  • The Value of Redundancy: What was once considered “inefficient” (e.g., having multiple ports or ships) has become a valuable asset in times of uncertainty.
  • Maersk’s Transformation: By becoming a comprehensive logistics provider, Maersk offers customers greater reliability, which is key to its profitability.

V. Volatility as a Magnifying Glass: The Stronger Companies Profit, the Weaker Ones Suffer

In times of high volatility, the gap between companies widens rapidly:

  • Stable Times: A week’s delay in decision-making may not matter, but in volatile times, freight rates can double in a week, and slow companies miss out on opportunities.
  • Leverage and Risk: High leverage can increase profits in good times, but during market reversals, companies with high leverage may be forced to sell assets at a loss.
  • Conclusion: Future shipping competition will focus on reaction speed: fast information transmission, decision-making, and execution.

In conclusion: The greater the storm, the more expensive the fish become. Only those companies with a strong financial foundation, effective organizational capabilities, and capable leadership can bring the benefits of the storm back to shore. Maersk’s performance turnaround is a clear example of this.