虎嗅

Reason Why a Peking University Professor Was Criticized: Flexibility Is Not a Benefit; The Right to Choose Is What Really Matters

原文:北大教授被骂的原因:灵活不是福利,选择权才是

Summary of the Core Content

This article focuses on the controversy surrounding "flexible employment." Professor Zhang Dandan from the Development Institute of Peking University's National School of Economics and Law sparked a heated debate when her statement that "flexible employment is a benefit" was taken out of context. However, she actually advocates for the rights of workers, having conducted research on the social security of delivery drivers and promoted pilot programs to improve their conditions. The article highlights the real challenges of flexible employment, such as the exploitation by algorithms, stagnation of skills, and the lack of personal brands. It also offers solutions, such as developing unique skills, leveraging information advantages, building a fan base, and networking with peers. Ultimately, the goal is to help individuals in the AI era avoid being passively employed and regain control over their work.

I. The Debate over "Flexible Employment as a Benefit": Misunderstandings Stem from Public Anxiety about the Future

Zhang Dandan's remarks became a hot topic of discussion, not because she doesn't support workers, but because people's anger stems from a sense of empathy. The original context of her statement was that many people have no choice but to accept jobs without contracts or social security benefits. She has long been researching the social security issues of delivery drivers and advocating for non-compulsory insurance programs, speaking up for their needs. The public's anxiety is fueled by predictions that by 2026, 320 million people will be in flexible employment out of a total labor force of 725 million (meaning one in four workers will be in this category). With the advancement of AI, the scenario where working and taking on freelance tasks are equally likely may become the norm. People fear not being flexible in the traditional sense, but rather being forced into a flexible arrangement where they lose control of their careers (for example, wanting stability but being limited to part-time work).

II. The Three Major Challenges of Flexible Employment: Freedom Illusory, Traps Hidden Behind

The so-called "freedom" of flexible employment is an illusion, with three major pitfalls:

1. "Pseudo-freedom" under Algorithmic Control: Drivers may choose their working hours, but algorithms determine when they receive orders and must meet delivery deadlines. For instance, Meituan's "Super Brain" reduced the delivery time for a 3-kilometer route from 1 hour to 38 minutes, saving 22 minutes, but this savings comes at the cost of the drivers' time and efficiency.

2. Skill Stagnation and AI Competition: Even after ten years of experience, the skills of online car drivers may not differ significantly from those of newer drivers, and AI is already beginning to replace some tasks. For example, the unmanned taxi service "Roubo Kuai Pao" in Wuhan handles over 250,000 orders per week, demonstrating how easily repetitive tasks can be automated.

3. Lack of Personal Brand: Without a distinct personal brand, drivers' earnings and career prospects are tied to the platform. If they switch to another platform, their previous achievements are often lost, and customers choose the driver who is the fastest, not the one they know personally.

III. Four Paths to Break Free from the Challenges: From Being Controlled to Making Choices

To escape these challenges, it's crucial to build assets that are not easily replaced by AI or other technologies:

1. Develop Unique Skills: Driver Wang Shaokun in Wuhan learned about local history and transformed his job from driving to providing guided tours, eventually becoming an in-demand "tour guide driver" with a unique set of skills.

2. Leverage Information Aspects: A delivery worker in Beijing discovered the business opportunity in pre-made meals, recorded customer preferences, and started a pre-made meal business, earning 200,000 yuan a year.

3. Build a Fan Base and Personal Brand: Female online car driver Yang Huijun uses her waiting time to create short videos, which gained her 300,000 followers and led to higher earnings through her media presence. Poet Wang Jibing writes poems while waiting for orders, reaching an audience of 20 million online.

4. Support Peers: A courier named Lao Zhou helped other couriers with maintenance and opened a repair shop, specializing in services for his colleagues, earning over 400 yuan a day.

IV. Six Practical Tips for Office Workers to Gain Control Over Their Future

Even if you have a stable job now, it's important to prepare for the possibility of becoming part of the flexible workforce:

1. Strengthen Your Current Position: 80% of those who successfully transition to new careers do so by building skills, building a fan base, and accumulating resources within their current company. Don't resign impulsively.

2. Identify What You Can Take With You: Make a list of skills and connections that will be valuable after leaving your job. Focus on developing these.

3. Set Aside Time for Personal Development: Spend 3 hours each week on industry reflection, creating a portfolio, or contributing to open-source projects. Your work should be attributed to you as an asset.

4. Treasure Your Company as a Customer: Think about what your colleagues need and what your peers lack; these can be opportunities for new businesses or skills you can share with them.

5. Create a Online Presence: Use social media platforms to make yourself accessible online.

6. Embrace AI to Enhance Your Skills: Don't wait for the company to teach you how to use AI; research how it can improve your work and take the initiative to learn how to use it effectively. This will give you more control over your career.

V. The Logic of Survival in the AI Era: Choice Is True Freedom

The debate about flexible employment reflects the anxiety of individuals in the AI era. Simple, repetitive tasks will be automated, and only those with unique skills or valuable connections will have real freedom. As Hemingway said, "For whom does the bell toll? For those who do not prepare in advance." By discussing flexible employment, we are considering our own future: do we want to be passively employed by technology, or do we want to actively choose how we work?

This article avoids technical jargon and uses real-life examples and data to reveal the realities of flexible employment, providing practical solutions for everyone. The key is to build your own uniqueness and independence so that you can make choices in the future, rather than being controlled by companies or algorithms.