虎嗅

Is Capital Really “Looking East”? China’s Capital Market Is Rebuilding Its Power to Price Technology Assets!

原文:资本真的在“向东看”吗?中国资本市场正在重建科技资产定价权!

Summary of Key Points

This article takes the soaring stock prices of ChangXin Technology (memory chips) and YuShu Technology (humanoid robots) on their first days of trading as an example to refute the claim that “global capital is simply flowing eastward.” It argues that what is truly happening is that China’s capital market is evolving from a traditional financing platform into a national innovation infrastructure. Through institutional reforms (such as the expansion of the fifth set of listing criteria for the STAR Market), China is re-establishing its ability to price local technology assets reasonably. This means that China’s own capital system can provide adequate support for high-tech companies without relying on foreign capital. The article also highlights that the government has shifted from direct subsidies to creating a conducive environment for capital to flow. The sharp rise in stock prices serves as both a sign of confidence and a warning of potential bubbles. It emphasizes that Shanghai and Hong Kong should complement each other rather than compete, and that in the future, the focus should be on “patient capital” rather than short-term speculative funds.

Detailed Analysis

1. The Capital Market’s Transformation: From a Financing Tool to an Innovation Driver

In the past, China’s stock market primarily served three purposes: helping companies raise funds, supporting state-owned enterprise reforms, and providing investment opportunities for individuals. Now, it has become a core mechanism for supporting technological innovation, taking on some of the roles previously held by the finance and banking sectors. For instance, the expansion of the fifth set of listing criteria for the STAR Market allows companies with valuable technologies (such as artificial intelligence or quantum technology) to go public, even if they have not yet generated significant profits, as long as their products are available and being used on a large scale. The success of ChangXin and YuShu in going public is a result of these new rules. For companies, going public is no longer just about raising money; it’s about accelerating growth by accessing research and development funds, integrating supply chains, attracting talent, and setting industry standards. For example, ChangXin can now compete more confidently with international chip giants, and YuShu can use the funds raised to commercialize its humanoid robots.

2. The Government’s Role in Supporting Innovation

The government’s approach to supporting technology companies has changed. Instead of providing direct subsidies (such as funding factory construction for chip manufacturers), it focuses on creating a supportive environment. This includes establishing parent funds and guiding funds that leverage insurance, banking, and private capital to invest in early-stage technology companies (for example, the National Venture Capital Guidance Fund can mobilize up to one trillion yuan). It has also set up mergers and acquisitions funds to help startups overcome difficulties in exiting the market. The key is to define clear boundaries: the government should not act as a guarantor (for example, by guaranteeing that certain strategic industries will not fail), otherwise, investors will focus solely on policy incentives and lose the ability to make market-based decisions.

3. The True Meaning of “Capital Flowing Eastward”

While the New York Times suggests that global capital is moving to China, the article argues that this is an exaggeration. The surge in ChangXin and YuShu’s stock prices mainly reflects the willingness of domestic investors to support high-tech companies, not a massive influx of foreign capital. The real change is that China’s technology companies are shifting their capital cycles from overseas financing and listing to domestic financing and listing, followed by domestic pricing. This is due to geopolitical factors and technological restrictions that make it risky for foreign capital to invest in cutting-edge Chinese technologies (such as chips and AI). Therefore, China needs to develop its own sustainable capital system. However, this does not mean isolation; China still wants to attract global capital but no longer relies on a single foreign channel.

4. Stock Price Surges as Both Signs and Warnings

The 4-6-fold increase on the first day of trading indicates both confidence in domestic chip and robotics industries and a shortage of high-quality technology assets (there is more capital than good projects). However, there are potential risks: the memory chip industry is capital-intensive and subject to rapid technological changes, as well as price fluctuations; humanoid robots have not yet proven their profitability, and there are uncertainties about when they will become commercially viable and whether customers will be willing to pay for them. If companies rely solely on their technological prospects without tangible progress (such as breakthroughs in research and development or revenue growth), their high valuations could turn into bubbles. As a result, stricter regulation is needed. Companies must disclose more information about their research and development, product development, and supply chain security, and the market should not rely on “national strategic” labels as a guarantee for high valuations.

5. Shanghai and Hong Kong as Complementary Partners

The article points out that Shanghai and Hong Kong complement each other in supporting China’s technological innovation efforts. Shanghai addresses the needs of domestic investors and the pricing of RMB-denominated assets, while Hong Kong facilitates connections with international capital and cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Companies can list in Hong Kong to attract international investors and then move to the STAR Market for additional funding. Hong Kong also needs to improve its infrastructure to support high-tech companies, such as by making its markets more attractive to institutional investors and enhancing its research capabilities, to maintain its role in pricing China’s core technology assets.

In Conclusion

The goal of China’s capital market is not to attract all global capital but to develop its own ability to price high-tech assets. While capital flows in and out with market trends, the ability to set prices and the mechanisms for capital formation are key to a country’s technological competitiveness. (Discussion topic: Do you think the expansion of the fifth set of listing criteria for the STAR Market will drive the rise of high-tech industries or create bubbles? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments.)