虎嗅

Automobile companies are flocking to produce robots: The anxiety of four wheels and the gamble of two legs

原文:车企扎堆造机器人:四个轮子的焦虑与两条腿的赌局

I. Quick Summary of Key Points

In the summer of 2026, more than a dozen major domestic automakers (such as Xpeng, BYD, Chery, Li Auto, and Xiaomi) collectively entered the humanoid robotics market. Xpeng’s robotics division raised over $900 million in its first round of financing, with Tencent and Alibaba joining forces in a rare partnership. BYD unveiled its first commercial robot, while Chery has delivered 3,000 units of its robots and has initiated an IPO process. This shift from manufacturing four-wheeled vehicles to humanoid robots is essentially a response to the extremely low profit margins in the automotive industry. The profit margins in the automotive sector are even lower than those of ordinary industrial enterprises. Humanoid robots are considered a future market worth trillions of dollars, and automakers have inherent advantages, including 70% of the necessary technology, a mature mass production supply chain, and ready-to-use application scenarios, making the transition seem logical. However, the reality is far from ideal: the technical challenges of humanoid robots are 20 times greater than those of building cars; core components are in short supply; and a reliable profit model has yet to be found. The entire industry is still in the early stages of competition.

---

II. Detailed Analysis

1. The Fundamental Reason Behind Automakers’ Rush into Humanoid Robotics: Profit Margins in the Automotive Industry Are Extremely Low

Many people think automakers are taking the lead in this trend, but in reality, most are forced to do so due to survival pressures:

In the first seven months of 2026, the entire automotive industry sold over 6 trillion yuan worth of vehicles, yet the total profit was only 210 billion yuan, resulting in an average profit margin of 3.6%, which is half of the 6.5% average profit margin of ordinary industrial enterprises. To put this in perspective, a car sold for 200,000 yuan yields a net profit of only 3,000 to 4,000 yuan for the manufacturer. Leading companies like Geely earn slightly more, around 6,000 yuan per car, while Chang'an and ZeroRun earn much less. The situation is even worse due to competitive pressures: at the beginning of the year, 16 automakers cut prices on more than 70 models, prompting the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology to intervene to prevent a vicious price war. On the cost side, the price of lithium carbonate nearly doubled, and automotive-grade chips increased by 180%. Automakers are in a difficult position with little room for maneuver.

2. Automakers Have Three Advantages That Startups Cannot Match

Automakers entering the humanoid robotics market possess three key advantages:

  • 70% of the necessary technology is already in place: Cameras, radar, autonomous driving algorithms, and motor control systems from smartphones and electric vehicles can be directly adapted for humanoid robots. Xpeng’s robots use the same AI chips as its autonomous driving systems, and BYD has stated that transferring automotive software to robots is relatively easy.
  • Years of Mass Production Experience: Automakers have extensive experience in producing millions of units, which ensures high quality control, supply chain management, and precision manufacturing. Chery has managed to reduce the price of its humanoid robots from millions of yuan to just over 280,000 yuan and can ship them to over 60 countries, a capability that startups may take years to achieve.
  • Ready-to-Use Application Scenarios: Automakers’ factories already require robots for tasks like logistics and quality inspection, and their 4S stores need robots for customer service. This provides an immediate market for their robots, allowing them to gather real-world data for product improvement.

3. The Challenge of Humanoid Robotics Is Not an Exaggeration

The claim that humanoid robotics are 20 times more difficult to develop than cars is not an exaggeration. Xpeng itself has acknowledged this. Automotive vehicles operate in a predictable environment with clear rules, while humanoid robots must adapt to the unpredictable real world, where unexpected events (such as spills or unexpected movements) can cause significant issues. The precision requirements for core components are also much higher, and the localization of these components is still limited, increasing the cost significantly.

4. The Biggest Problem in the Industry: Lack of a Profit Model

Even with the technology, the biggest challenge is finding a profitable business model. Automakers’ traditional models of selling hardware and scaling production do not apply to humanoid robots. The industry is still trying out models like charging for rental services, but without a large user base, the costs cannot be covered. Everyone recognizes the potential market, but no one knows how to generate revenue.

5. A Long Road Ahead

The year 2026 is considered the beginning of mass production of humanoid robots, but the next 2-3 years will be a critical period for the industry. Only those who can reduce costs and find sustainable customer models will succeed. The automotive industry took nearly 100 years to become widely adopted, and humanoid robots will likely take even longer to become mainstream. Many automakers are still relying on traditional approaches, which may lead to wasted investment. No one can confidently predict the winner of this new competition.