虎嗅

"After the start of school, the head of a parents' committee 'fell apart' gradually."

原文:开学后,一个家委会会长“轻轻地碎掉了”

Summary of the News

The recent hot topic about "fourth-grade parents refusing to take turns cleaning the school and angrily leaving the parent group" has brought the long-maligned parent committees to the forefront of public discussion. Many people criticize the parent committees for being mere formality, yet they are confused as to why this organization, which didn't exist decades ago, has become a standard in schools across the country. This report interviewed a veteran parent committee member who has been involved for six years, serving as both the class representative, the grade representative, and the vice-chairperson of the school-level committee. She revealed the true workings of the parent committees, identifying the tasks that are genuinely necessary from those that are just a form of passing the buck. She even shared her honest feelings, saying that "doing this work is like being the company's free logistics staff, dedicating 30%-40% of your personal time with no reward."

---

Detailed Analysis

1. Do You Think Parent Committees Are a Group of People with Privileges? In Reality, Most Are Volunteers Under Constant Scrutiny

Many people think of parent committees as a way to gain favor with teachers and secure special treatment for their children. However, those who have actually worked in them know that it's purely voluntary and unpaid, with no real benefits, and they are constantly criticized by all the parents:

Parent committees are structured in three levels. The school-level committee is responsible for choosing the cafeteria and making major suggestions regarding school-family cooperation. The grade-level committee coordinates activities like group purchases and sports events. The bulk of the work falls on the class-level committee, which consists of eight people who have to handle administrative, logistical, procurement, and financial tasks. Before the start of the school year, they have to compare prices online to buy uniform exercise books, collect a maximum of 100 yuan per semester from the students, and keep track of every expense down to the last penny. They also act as photographers and security during events, and even mediate conflicts between children.

The most challenging roles are in procurement and finance. If the items purchased are too expensive, they are criticized for waste; if they are too cheap, the quality is criticized, and there are allegations of kickbacks. In previous reports, two members of the procurement committee at this school resigned due to the stress. Even the six-year veteran committee member admitted that he joined just to get to know the teachers, but as the only male parent in the class, he was forced to continue for six years without any special benefits, even giving up his own child's lunch spot.

2. Why Didn't Parent Committees Exist in the Past, but Now They Are Essential in Every School?

The presence of parent committees is not a random decision by schools; it's a result of current realities:

Firstly, public schools have long abolished tuition and exercise book fees, so parents now have to buy these items themselves. If 40 parents each bought books of different sizes and colors, teachers would be overwhelmed. Parent committees help by coordinating these needs to save everyone's time.

Secondly, teachers are already overworked with non-teaching tasks such as inspections, paperwork, and evaluations. If dozens of parents constantly ask about their children, teachers have no time to prepare for lessons. Parent committees act as a buffer, taking on these miscellaneous tasks to relieve their burden.

Finally, parent committees serve as a non-confrontational channel for resolving conflicts. For example, when a teacher previously punished children for breaking rules, parents were upset. If a parent had approached the teacher directly, it could have led to tension, but the committee communicated with the school leadership, resolving the issue without causing problems.

3. The Controversy over Parents Cleaning Classrooms: Schools Shifting Responsibility

The recent controversy over parents taking turns cleaning the school is a case of schools shifting their responsibilities:

Initially, schools only asked parents to help with a thorough cleaning before the start of the term. However, after a holiday, fans and air conditioners would be covered in dirt and graffiti, and cleaning them was dangerous for young students. Since schools lacked dedicated cleaning staff, they asked parents to volunteer. Over time, it became unfair to rely on just a few willing volunteers, leading to the implementation of a rotation system based on student numbers.

This is unreasonable since tasks like cleaning fans and air conditioners should be paid for by the school using public funds. Instead, many schools now even ask parents to do routine cleaning tasks during class, depriving children of the opportunity to learn valuable life skills like cleaning. This is putting the cart before the horse.

4. The Most Annoying Aspects of Parent Committees: Formality That Adds No Value

The veteran committee member noted that at least a third of the work is meaningless formality:

For example, the "school safety duty" requires parents to stand at the school gate during drop-off and pick-up times. Parents receive no training and have no safety equipment. They just take time off from work and take photos for inspection purposes, with no real safety benefit. Other tasks, such as creating fancy cultural walls and handmade blackboards, should be done by children to exercise their creativity, but instead, parent committees spend nights preparing materials for social media posts.

These tasks are exhausting for the committee members and annoying for parents. What was meant to be a way to help reduce the school's burden has become a target for criticism.

5. The Veteran Committee Member's Advice: A Healthy School-Home Relationship Depends on Clear Roles

After six years of experience, the committee member concluded that a healthy school-home relationship relies on a clear division of roles: "The school should take the lead, and the family should support." Schools should not shift their responsibilities to parents, such as cleaning and security, and should focus on teaching. Parents should not overstep their bounds by trying to gain favors for their children or do everything for them. Children should learn essential life skills like cleaning. By reducing formality and focusing on genuine efforts, teachers can teach more effectively, and parents can spend more time with their children, which is far more beneficial.