虎嗅

The Economist says Chinese car companies are moving overseas, but this is just the beginning…

原文:《经济学人》说中国车企搬向全球,但这只是开始……

Hello! I'm your financial analysis assistant. This article from the TOP Innovation Zone Research Institute provides a very insightful look at the phenomenon of Chinese companies expanding their business overseas. It doesn't just focus on the surface of Chinese cars selling well; instead, it delves deep into the underlying commercial logic, production models, geopolitical strategies, and national strategic transformations behind these overseas ventures, much like peeling an onion layer by layer.

To make it easier for you to understand, I've broken down this long article into a core summary and a detailed analysis from five perspectives.

---

📝 Core Content Summary

The main point of this article is that Chinese companies going global is no longer just about selling cars; it's about a global reorganization and competition within the industrial chain.

1. Motivation has changed: It's no longer about exporting because domestic sales are low; rather, domestic operations are focused on scale, while overseas operations generate profits.

2. Production models have changed: Companies are no longer moving entire factories overseas; instead, they are transferring the final assembly steps (KD, or Knock Down) abroad, while keeping the core technology and supply chains in China.

3. Competitors have changed: Europe is no longer just imposing barriers; they are now trying to exchange market access for technology and have even started handing over idle factories to Chinese companies to operate.

4. Rules have changed: China is beginning to export its own anti-competitive practices overseas, requiring companies to operate in a compliant manner and avoid vicious price wars.

5. Strategy has changed: For the first time, the government has included industrial relocation in its top-level planning, shifting from a secretive approach to a more reasonable and orderly strategy.

---

🔍 Five-Dimensional Analysis

1. The Truth Behind Overseas Expansion: It's About Profit Division, Not Dumping Inventory

Many people think that Chinese cars are exported because of overcapacity and poor domestic sales. The article argues that this view may have been true in 2023, but it's completely outdated by 2026.

  • Domestic Situation: Although sales have reached record highs (over 34 million units), industry profit margins are extremely low (only 4.4%), and price wars have left many companies losing money.
  • Overseas Situation: Export prices are high (around $30,000 per unit), and the export volume of new energy vehicles has surged. Leading Chinese companies like Chery, BYD, and Geely generate a significant portion of their revenue overseas, sometimes even more than in China.
  • In Plain Language: It's like a restaurant: the domestic store may have a lot of customers, but they have to discount heavily to attract them, leaving the staff and owners exhausted with no profit. In contrast, the overseas store may have fewer customers, but they are willing to pay higher prices, resulting in higher profits. So, domestic operations focus on volume to maintain scale, while overseas operations focus on profitability. The main export products are new energy vehicles; the export of fuel vehicles is on the decline, and the notion of "dumping fuel vehicles" is no longer valid.

2. Production Models: What's Being Moved Abroad Is Just the Final Assembly

When people hear about building factories overseas, they might imagine moving entire workshops. But it's not that extreme. The common practice is KD (Knock Down).

  • How It Works: Cars are disassembled into parts and then reassembled locally.
  • SKD: The body and engine are already assembled; only the tires and seats are added (similar to how IKEA furniture is assembled).
  • CKD: Core components like motors and chassis are assembled locally (currently the most common method, accounting for over 60%).
  • Why This Is Done:
  • Tariffs: Parts are subject to lower tariffs or even zero tariffs.
  • Cost Savings: Disassembling the car and shipping it in containers saves more than 30% on shipping costs compared to shipping the whole car by roll-on roll-off ships, and it's also less prone to damage.
  • Scale Comparison: The Szeged factory employs 960 people, while BYD's factory in Brazil has about 2,300 employees. In contrast, a domestic car factory can employ tens of thousands of people and is surrounded by a large supply chain network.
  • In Plain Language: What Chinese companies move abroad is just the least technologically advanced and most labor-intensive final assembly step. The key components like batteries, chips, software, and supply chains remain in China. So, there's no need to worry about domestic industrial hollowing out; we're just outsourcing the least valuable part of the production process.

3. The European Game: From Barriers to Exchanging Market Access for Technology

This is the most interesting part of the article. Europe used to impose tariffs, but now they're adopting a more strategic approach.

  • New EU Measures: The Industrial Acceleration Act requires that if a company wants subsidies, 70% of the parts must come from the EU or be assembled in the EU. For Chinese companies, there are options such as forming joint ventures, hiring more local workers, investing in research and development, or licensing technology.
  • Essence: This is almost a replica of China's Automobile Industry Policy from 1994, where China exchanged market access for technology. Now Europe is doing the same.
  • Realistic Challenges: The EU doesn't have much money to offer in subsidies (Germany's 3 billion euros accounts for only 7% of the market), so these rules are not very effective.
  • In Plain Language: Europe realizes that completely blocking Chinese cars is not feasible, so they prefer to extract some benefits, such as technology, jobs, and revenue. Although it sounds tough, these rules are more of a tactic and a negotiation tool rather than a complete blockade.

4. Western Companies Opening Up: Lending Factories and Brands, Even Sharing Technology

The biggest shift in 2026 is that Western companies are actively handing over factories to Chinese partners.

  • Examples: Chery has revitalized a former Nissan factory in Barcelona; Ford and Geely have a joint venture in Valencia; Stellantis has opened its Spanish factory to Leapmotor; Nissan and Chery are discussing the Sunderland factory.
  • Brand Sharing: Chery and Jaguar Land Rover have created the new brand FREELANDER, with Chinese companies controlling the technology and supply chain and British companies providing the brand and design.
  • Technology Sharing: Dongfeng has shared its岚图 and Mingshi technology platforms with Stellantis; Jeep is manufacturing new energy vehicles in Wuhan.
  • Benefits and Costs:
  • Western Intent: Empty factories are better used by Chinese companies to maintain employment and capacity.
  • Chinese Costs: This often involves giving up some control (for example, Leapmotor has 51% ownership in Stellantis), which limits pricing and distribution power.
  • Benefits: It allows Chinese companies to enter European markets quickly. Leapmotor used Stellantis' channels to expand its network by 850 outlets in two years, with a 442% increase in exports.
  • In Plain Language: It's a win-win situation. European companies need new technology and efficiency to stay competitive, while Chinese companies need access to European markets and established brands. For example, the idea of Jeep manufacturing in Wuhan with Chinese technology was once a joke, but now it's a reality.

5. National Strategy: From Unregulated Growth to Orderly Expansion

The article also mentions the Guidelines for Overseas Competition and Compliance in the Automotive Industry released on September 1, 2026. This document marks a fundamental shift in China's overseas expansion strategy.

  • Anti-Competitive Practices: The guidelines prohibit vicious price wars overseas and require pricing based on costs to protect brand image. It's no longer just about avoiding competition in China; it's about avoiding it abroad as well.
  • Compliance Requirements: Companies are required to comply with local labor laws, environmental laws, and data security regulations. The article highlights labor issues in Brazil and Hungary, reminding companies that domestic efficiency advantages (such as long working hours and low standards) are illegal overseas and cannot be replicated.
  • Top-Level Planning: For the first time, the government has defined industrial relocation as a reasonable and orderly cross-border strategy.
  • In Plain Language: In the past, Chinese companies went global in a more unregulated manner. Now the state is setting clear rules: no more vicious price wars or special treatment abroad. Companies must follow local laws, especially regarding labor rights, as these are non-negotiable.

---

💡 Conclusion

Returning to the small town of Szeged mentioned at the beginning of the article, 70% of the 960 workers there are locals, and the university offers relevant courses, with vocational school students from all over the city.

This is not just a story about a factory; it's a microcosm of a larger trend: Thirty years ago, we welcomed foreign car companies in places like Shanghai, Changchun, and Shiyan to learn car manufacturing technology. Thirty years later, we are exporting our technology and models to Hungary, Brazil, and Spain. The difference is that this time, we are the ones leading the way. Chinese companies going global is no longer just about trade; it's about a global integration of standards, rules, technology, and brands.