Hello! I'm your financial analysis assistant. This article is written by Professor Shen Jie from the Planning Institute of Xiamen University, and it presents a very sharp and counterintuitive viewpoint: the so-called "illegal constructions" that we constantly criticize may actually be the "saviors" of urban renewal, but they are forced to become illegal due to the existing systems.
To help you fully understand this article, which is both academic and highly relevant to real-world issues, I have broken it down into a summary of the main points and a detailed analysis from five different perspectives.
---
📝 Summary of the Main Points
In one sentence:
Cities today no longer need massive demolition and construction; instead, they need minor repairs and self-upgrades. However, the current legal rules are still based on the logic of "buying land for a single use and for a fixed period," which prevents people from legally adding extensions or converting their homes into other uses (such as adding a sunroom or turning a residence into a café). As a result, these modifications are often done secretly, leading to what are considered "illegal constructions."
The solution:
We should stop focusing solely on fines and demolitions and instead reform the rules. We should change from a system where land is sold once for a fixed period to one where land is rented annually. Owners should be allowed to change the use or size of their properties within safe limits, but they would have to pay a rent to the government each year. This would not only legalize these improvements but also provide a steady income for the government and contribute to a more vibrant city.
---
🔍 In-Depth Analysis: Five Perspectives on the Problem of "Illegal" Urban Renewal
1. **The Phenomenon: Why Are There So Many “Patchwork” Buildings?**
[Easy-to-understand Explanation]
If you visit the villa areas or old city districts in Xiamen or many other big cities, you'll notice that many buildings look as if they have been patched up.
- Villa Areas: Owners add sunrooms, build small structures in their yards, or use aluminum materials that look identical to the original walls (making it hard to detect the alterations).
- Old City Districts: Dilapidated houses are converted into popular cafes or restaurants. For example, a business on Xiamen's Xianan Road converted a dangerous building into a studio and café, increasing its value from 3 million to 9 million yuan and doubling the surrounding rents.
[Key Point]
These modifications are essentially a form of asset optimization. Houses are people's most valuable assets, and as urban infrastructure improves (such as with the addition of subways or parks), the value of these properties increases. It's a rational economic behavior for owners to try to increase the value of their homes. However, due to the lack of legal options, they are forced to take illegal actions.
2. **The Root Cause: The Rules Don't Keep Up with Changing Needs**
[Easy-to-understand Explanation]
Why are these legitimate modifications considered illegal? The rules were established 30 years ago, during an era of rapid urban growth. Since then, market demands have changed, but the laws have not.
- Past Logic (Incremental Era): When the government sold land, it defined the use and height of the buildings for 70 or 40 years and collected the full payment at the time of sale. It's like buying shoes with a fixed lifespan and size.
- Current Logic (Stock Era): With improved infrastructure, a piece of land can now support multiple uses. For instance, a property that could only be used for residential purposes can now be more profitable as a commercial space. However, under the old rules, such modifications are considered illegal.
[Conclusion]
The problem is not with the people but with outdated laws. Using rules designed for new buildings to regulate old ones inevitably leads to widespread illegal activities.
3. **The Vicious Cycle: The Dilemma of Law Enforcement**
[Easy-to-understand Explanation]
Because illegal constructions are so common, it's difficult for urban management and planning departments to address them effectively.
- Inadequate Resources: They don't have the manpower and resources to inspect every building.
- Selective Enforcement: There is a tendency to target certain buildings or ignore others. Some areas even have unofficial rules that say "if you pay a fee, you won't be fined."
- Consequences:
1. Fairness Issues: Those who are fined feel unlucky, while those who escape fines think they are lucky.
2. Corruption: This creates opportunities for bribery and undermines the authority of the law.
3. Weak Governance: People lose trust in the law and rely on personal connections or luck instead.
[Key Point]
This cycle of illegal activities wastes government resources, damages public trust, and hinders the vitality of the city.
4. **The Solution: From “One-Time Sales” to “Annual Renting”
[Easy-to-understand Explanation]
The author suggests establishing a new pricing system based on annual rentals for existing properties.
- Permits for Modifications: Owners would be allowed to apply to change the use of their properties or increase their size, with certain restrictions (e.g., no factories or damage to the neighborhood's appearance).
- Rent Payments: They would have to pay a rent to the government based on the new use and size of the property.
- Example: If you add a 20-square-meter sunroom or convert a residence into a café, you would pay a certain percentage of the market value each year.
- Dynamic Adjustment: Rent rates could be adjusted based on market conditions, preventing overdevelopment when a certain use becomes popular and encouraging more diverse uses when it's less so.
[Analogy:**
It's like switching from a “buy-it-for-good” system to a “subscription” system. Instead of buying the right to use a property for 70 years, you can pay a fee each year to use it in a flexible manner.
5. **A Win-Win Situation for All**
[Easy-to-understand Explanation:
This new system would benefit all parties:
- For the Government (Financial Sustainability): Land sales provide a one-time income, but annual rentals create a steady stream of revenue. For example, a villa community could generate 1.8 million yuan in rent annually, equivalent to the income of a small business. Additionally, as property values increase, taxes (such as deed tax and income tax) would also rise.
- For Residents (Asset Appreciation): Properties can be legally modified, increasing their value. There's no more fear of demolition, and residents can freely manage their properties according to market demands, generating additional income.
- For the City (Vitality and Appearance): Old districts can be revitalized, becoming popular tourist spots. Unified building regulations improve the city's appearance, and the government doesn't need to spend extra money on facelifts. This also creates jobs and boosts local consumption.
---
💡 Additional Comments from a Journalist's Perspective
The value of this article lies in its ability to confront a difficult reality:
1. Acknowledging the Reality: It recognizes that illegal constructions can be reasonable in today's urban context, rather than simply condemning them morally.
2. Proposing Innovative Solutions: It offers concrete suggestions for reform, which align with the central government's goals of high-quality development and improving the quality of existing assets.
3. Challenges in Implementation: Although the logic is sound, implementing these changes is very challenging:
- Valuation: How to determine fair rent rates and adjust them annually requires sophisticated market analysis.
- Fairness: How to balance the needs of old and new properties? If old properties can be freely modified, new property owners might feel disadvantaged.
- Resistance: Existing planning, land, and urban management departments would need to undergo significant changes, which involves significant conflicts of interest.
In summary:
Urban renewal should not aim to create a city that looks perfect but should allow it to grow naturally. If laws only allow uniformity at the expense of diversity, the city will become rigid and expensive. Turning illegal constructions into legal ones and changing fines into annual rentals could be the key to revitalizing cities.