虎嗅

Hong Kong's Redemption: Thirty Years

原文:香港救赎三十年

Hello! I'm your financial analysis assistant. This article from "Qin Shuo's WeChat Moments" is a typical example of a deep commentary that both offers a critical perspective and points out a direction for improvement.

The author hasn't been blinded by Hong Kong's recent impressive GDP figures and booming stock market. Instead, they see through the surface and highlights that Hong Kong's current success is largely due to leveraging the strengths of the Chinese mainland's industries and the trends in AI and trade, rather than a fundamental industrial transformation of its own.

Let me break down this long article into five key points to help you fully understand Hong Kong's current situation and its future in plain language:

---

1. Don't Be Misled by the “3 Trillion” Figures: The Numbers Are Impressive, but They’re Just Temporary

The article starts with some impressive statistics: Hong Kong’s GDP is expected to exceed HK$3 trillion by 2025, making it the sixth city in the “3-trillion club” alongside Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Chongqing, and Guangzhou, with a high per capita GDP as well. The growth rate in the first half of 2026 even reached 5.1%, outpacing the average in Guangdong and the Chinese mainland.

But the author immediately brings a reality check: How was this wealth earned?

Many people think Hong Kong has become an “AI manufacturing center” because of a 63.7% surge in AI exports. That’s completely wrong. Hong Kong doesn’t have its own GPU factories or chip production lines. This surge in AI hardware exports is essentially a benefit of its role as a trade hub.

  • To put it simply: Hong Kong acts like a huge “logistics distribution center” and “customs clearance agency.” The Chinese mainland (especially cities like Shenzhen and Dongguan) produces a large number of AI servers and chip components for global sales, and Hong Kong handles the intermediation.
  • What does it earn from? Not from manufacturing the products themselves, but from fees for logistics, customs clearance, cross-border insurance, supply chain services, and cross-border financing.

Therefore, Hong Kong’s strength comes from its connection to the mainland’s robust industrial chain. Without this, it would struggle to capitalize on the AI trend. The current GDP growth is largely due to the mainland’s manufacturing output being exported through Hong Kong.

---

2. The “Revival” of the Capital Market: A Return to Institutional Advantages, or a Flash in the Pan?

In addition to trade, the Hong Kong stock market has also thrived, with the number of IPOs doubling and daily trading volumes soaring, keeping investment banks and law firms very busy. The author believes this is driven by more than just increased capital; it’s also because confidence in the system has returned:

1. Rejuvenation of Institutional Advantages: After years of social unrest, Hong Kong has regained stability. Its status as a free port with a common law system and free capital flow has once again been recognized by global investors.

2. Talent Return and Policy Support: The government has introduced programs like the “High-Talent Pass” and “Elite Talent Scheme” to attract back some of the talent that had left. Combined with capital flowing from the mainland, this has contributed to the impressive numbers.

3. Global Safe Haven: Amidst increasing global geopolitical tensions, Hong Kong remains a safe asset for the wealthy. By the end of 2025, total bank deposits exceeded HK$19 trillion, indicating that global investors still trust its stability.

In simple terms: The current stock market boom is like a shot in the arm for Hong Kong’s economy. But whether this will solve its underlying problems remains to be seen.

---

3. Comparing Hong Kong with Singapore, Japan, and South Korea: Why Is Hong Kong So One-Dimensional?

This is the most critical and thought-provoking part of the article. The author compares Hong Kong with Singapore, Japan, and South Korea, pointing out its biggest issue: path dependence and a complacent attitude.

  • What did Singapore, Japan, and South Korea do?
  • They also started as trade hubs but didn’t settle for being just middlemen. They actively pursued industrial upgrading.
  • Singapore: Despite its small size, it retains more than 20% of its economy in manufacturing, focusing on petrochemicals, biomedicine, and semiconductors, earning high-value profits.
  • Japan and South Korea: They shifted low-end manufacturing overseas while retaining high-end manufacturing and research and development, becoming tech powers.
  • The Story of Samsung: Samsung’s transformation from a contract manufacturer to a technology leader took years of investment and patience.
  • What did Hong Kong do?
  • One-Dimensional Economy: In 2023, the service sector accounted for 93.5% of GDP, with finance, real estate, and trade dominating.
  • Short-Sighted Profit Seeking: Capital prefers quick, easy profits.
  • Example 1: The Digital Port plan aimed to create an “Oriental Silicon Valley” but ended up becoming a luxury housing area, with technology becoming a mere facade.
  • Example 2: Li Zekai sold his Tencent shares early on because he thought tech returns were too slow. This reflects the prevailing mindset of Hong Kong capital—unwilling to wait for long-term gains.
  • Result: The economy has become hollowed out. Goods are imported, processed, and then exported quickly, with little local value creation. Hong Kong would be vulnerable if the global AI market slows down.

In simple terms: Singapore and South Korea are “top students” who not only understand how to do things but also create new opportunities (through technology and manufacturing). Hong Kong is just an intermediary. If other countries stop producing or start selling their products on their own, Hong Kong will be at a disadvantage.

---

4. The Embarrassing Reality: GDP Is Rising, but Why Don’t People Feel the Benefits?

The article mentions a paradox: GDP has increased, but the benefits are unevenly distributed.

  • Who’s Making the Money? Foreign traders, major financial institutions, and professional services (law firms, accounting firms).
  • These industries are highly competitive and create few jobs, mainly for high-net-worth individuals and large companies.
  • Who’s Not Making the Money? Ordinary workers. There are few manufacturing jobs in Hong Kong, and goods passing through the city don’t create many jobs.
  • High Housing Prices and Wealth Gap: Land ownership is highly concentrated, and the construction of public housing is hindered, leading to high living costs and squeezing the living standards of ordinary people.

In simple terms: It’s like a restaurant where the owners (financial institutions and traders) make huge profits, while the waiters (ordinary workers) see little increase in wages, and rent (housing prices) keep rising. If this structural imbalance isn’t addressed, even impressive economic figures won’t make society stable.

---

5. The Way Forward: From a “Unique Window” to a More Balanced Economy

Finally, the author outlines the challenges and solutions Hong Kong faces:

Challenges:

  • The Decline of the “Unique Window” Status: Hong Kong used to be the only link between the mainland and the world. Now, with the establishment of the Shanghai Free Trade Zone, Hainan Free Trade Port, and Shenzhen Qianhai, trade routes have diversified, making Hong Kong just one of many options.
  • Increasing Competition: Shanghai is catching up in finance, Shenzhen is leading in technology, and other cities are competing in trade.

Solutions (Moving Towards a Balanced Economy):

1. Fully Integrating with the Mainland (Relying on the Greater Bay Area): Stop relying on Hong Kong alone and adopt a strategy of “Hong Kong research and development + Shenzhen transformation + Dongguan manufacturing.”

  • Evidence: The “2025 Global Innovation Index” ranks the “Shenzhen-Hong Kong-Guangzhou” cluster first, highlighting the Greater Bay Area’s synergy.

2. Industrial Upgrading (Investing in Real Solutions):

  • Infrastructure: The government is investing billions in infrastructure for innovation in the Northern Metropolis Area, Xintian Technology City, and Hetao Cooperation Zone.
  • 制度改革: Changes to the listing rules for tech companies to make it easier for them to go public on the Hong Kong stock market.
  • New Directions: Expanding into the Middle East and the gold market to enhance the RMB’s international pricing power. This is not just about business but also about serving national strategic goals.

In simple terms: Hong Kong can no longer rely solely on its past strengths (free port, finance). It must integrate with the Greater Bay Area, combining the mainland’s manufacturing capabilities with Hong Kong’s international connections. The government needs to invest in hard-tech industries that may grow slowly but are valuable, rather than focusing on real estate and short-term financial gains.

---

Summary

The core message of this article is:

Hong Kong’s current success is due to the combination of the mainland’s industrial growth and global capital flows, not a fundamental transformation of its own industries.

  • Strengths: Stable system, financial hub status, connection to the Greater Bay Area.
  • Weaknesses: Hollowed-out economy, over-reliance on real estate and finance, large wealth gap, lack of core manufacturing.
  • Future: Hong Kong must transition from a trade intermediary to a comprehensive economy that combines innovation, finance, and high-end services, deeply integrating with the Greater Bay Area. Otherwise, its unique advantages will gradually fade.

For ordinary people, it’s important to understand that Hong Kong’s economic performance doesn’t necessarily reflect improvements in people’s lives. The road ahead is tough, but with effort, progress is possible.