Hello! I'm your financial analysis assistant. This article from "Uncle Lei Writes Stories" uses a very sharp and vivid metaphor—"there are more doctors than donkeys"—to highlight the severe employment challenges and identity anxiety faced by the doctoral population in China following the expansion of higher education.
As an economist and financial journalist, I will break down the economic logic, supply and demand relationships, and individual destinies behind this phenomenon in plain language.
Summary of Key Points
The main argument of the article is that the Chinese doctoral community is experiencing a sharp devaluation from a "scarce resource" to an "excess labor force." Ten years ago, doctors were highly sought after by universities; today, with a large number of doctors in the pipeline, both universities and companies are becoming more selective, leading to situations such as doctors taking on roles as counselors or facing the pressure of either getting promoted or leaving their positions. The article compares the rise in donkey meat prices to the devaluation of doctors, suggesting that this change is not due to a lack of ability among doctors themselves, but rather because industrialization (or digitalization/AI) has replaced routine intellectual labor, coupled with an oversupply caused by the expansion of universities, significantly reducing the "value for money" of doctors in the job market. As a result, doctors find themselves in an awkward position: they struggle to compete for research opportunities in universities, are considered too expensive for companies, and feel embarrassed to return to their hometowns.
---
In-Depth Analysis: Five Dimensions of the Situation
1. Imbalance in Supply and Demand: The Cruel Transition from "Desired" to "Selective"
[Plain Language: From "the emperor's daughter having no marriage worries" to "a dating market flooded with candidates"]
We need to understand a basic economic principle: scarcity makes things valuable.
- Ten years ago: There were 300,000 doctoral students nationwide, with fewer than 70,000 graduating each year. A doctor was a true "hard currency" for universities, which offered housing, job positions, and benefits to retain talent.
- Today: The number of doctoral students has risen to 750,000, with 1.2 million graduates in ten years. This means a huge annual supply of new doctors.
- Consequence: With millions more highly educated individuals in the market and fewer positions available, especially in academia and high-end research, a "buyer's market" has formed.
- Universities' Attitude: They are no longer eager to recruit; instead, they are more selective, requiring young candidates (under 30) with top-tier publications (such as SCI Zone 1 papers or National Natural Science Foundation grants).
- Raising the Bar: Some second-tier universities require three papers in "China Social Sciences" per year as a screening mechanism. Knowing there are many doctors, they set high standards to maintain their reputation.
Conclusion: Doctors are no longer considered elites but have become ordinary highly educated workers. Your degree no longer proves your excellence; it only shows you survived a long academic program.
2. Mismatch in Jobs: Doctors as Counselors—Is It Underutilization or a Rational Choice?
[Plain Language: Using a sword to chop vegetables because it's safer than fighting dragons]
Many see doctors becoming counselors as a waste of talent, but from an economic perspective, it's a rational choice for risk avoidance and cost-effectiveness.
- The Pitfalls of Academic Positions: Universities often have a "promote or leave" policy, requiring a certain number of publications and projects within a four-year contract, otherwise, the doctor may face termination and even financial losses.
- The Stability of Counselor Roles: Although counselors' work is routine, it provides job security and a stable position. For doctors in their 30s with mortgages and family responsibilities, stability is more valuable than academic aspirations.
- The Side Effect of Degree Inflation: With many masters in the market, doctors may seem less valuable. Universities use them for administrative roles to improve their status or to prepare future officials.
Conclusion: This is not about laziness but about the low tolerance for failure in an uncertain job market. Choosing a stable job, even if it underutilizes their skills, is the best option for most doctors from ordinary backgrounds.
3. Why Don't Companies Want Doctors? Master's Degrees Outperform Doctors
[Plain Language: Employers Need "Ready-to-Use" Workers, Not "Slow-Burning" Scientists]
Many doctors wonder why companies don't hire them. The answer is simple: cost-effectiveness.
- Cost and Efficiency: Masters graduate in large numbers each year, at lower salaries and with stronger adaptability, making them more immediately useful.
- Companies' Needs: Most companies (especially non-technology leaders) need practical, efficient workers, not disruptive innovators. Capital prefers quick results.
- The Impact of AI: While AI hasn't completely replaced doctors, it has automated routine tasks. Many doctoral tasks, like data analysis, can be done faster and cheaper by AI.
Conclusion: Unless you're in a top company like Huawei or Tencent, the "value for money" of masters is higher than that of doctors in most industries. Traditional companies see high degrees as a luxury, not as a sign of high productivity.
4. A Distorted Evaluation System: Papers as the Only Measure of Success, Teaching as a Secondary Factor
[Plain Language: Certificates Matter More than Skills, Leading to Increased Competition]
Professor Zhu Guohua's controversy highlights the issue of "paperism" in academia.
- Why Do Universities Focus on Papers? Because quantification is easy. Teaching quality is hard to measure; papers provide clear indicators.
- Limited Resources and Competition: To improve rankings, universities use paper quantity and funding as metrics.
- Consequence: Doctors must publish heavily, often without practical value. This creates an academic bubble, leading to a focus on quantity rather than quality.
Conclusion: This system favors those who are good at writing papers, not those with strong teaching or innovative abilities, harming the academic ecosystem.
5. Future Prospects: Will Doctors' Value Rise or Fall?
[Plain Language: Two Possibilities, Depending on Whether You Can Avoid Homogenization]
The article ends with two metaphors:
- Metaphor 1: Donkey Meat Prices Rise (Scarcity Returns): If AI becomes widespread and replaces routine work, doctors with deep thinking and innovation will become as scarce as genuine donkey meat.
- Condition: You must be a genius with irreplaceable skills. Otherwise, you'll be like fake donkey meat, eliminated by the market.
- Metaphor 2: Sunshine Roses Fall in Price (Excess Homogenization): Sunshine roses were once expensive due to scarcity; now, overproduction has lowered their value.
- Current Situation: If your research is in a competitive field, your value will decrease if it's standardized.
Advice for Ordinary People:
1. Don't View a Doctorate as a Safe Haven: It's a high-risk investment. Enter carefully if you don't have a clear academic interest or industry need.
2. Break the Paperism Mindset: If you want to work in companies, focus on internships, projects, and practical experience. Employers value problem-solving skills, not just publications.
3. Seek Differentiation: Be unique; ask yourself if your research is valuable and relevant to industry needs. Can you create a significant work?
4. Adjust Your Expectations: Accept that a doctorate is just a degree, not a lifelong honor. Be prepared to start from the grassroots or face the pressure of leaving your position if you don't get promoted.
In Summary:
The devaluation of doctors reflects the punishment for "mediocre highly educated individuals" in an era of knowledge-based payment. Only those who can create unique value and solve complex problems will retain their value; otherwise, they will be marginalized like overproduced roses.