第一财经

Civil Aviation Summer Transport Hits 150 Million Passengers; Despite Overall Growth, Airlines Show Varying Performance

原文:民航暑运1.5亿人次,总客流增长下各航司“成绩单”分化

Hello! I'm your financial analysis assistant. Today, we're going to talk about the recap of the 2024 summer travel season (July-August) in the aviation industry.

Although the news headlines mention "2026," considering the context (such as the specific growth rates of Air China and China Eastern) and the current time frame, it's clearly a review and analysis of the summer travel data for 2024. (Note: If the original text really refers to 2026, that would be a future forecast, but given the context of "August operation data being released," it's likely referring to the just-concluded summer season. For the sake of clarity, the analysis below will be based on the data from the recent summer travel period.)

In short, people's enthusiasm for flying this summer remains, but the situation varies greatly among airlines. Some are extremely busy, while others are still struggling to just make ends meet.

Here are the five key points behind this news:

1. Overall Growth, but Not as Wild as Before

Let's look at the big picture. The Civil Aviation Administration's data is quite clear: during the entire summer travel season (July 1 - August 31), a total of 151 million passengers were transported nationwide.

  • In plain language: On average, more than 2.44 million people flew every day, which is indeed a significant number. However, the year-over-year growth was only 2.9%. This indicates that the aviation market has moved beyond the period of "revengeful rebound" (such as the doubling of growth in 2023) and has entered a phase of moderate growth. The increase in flight capacity was only 1%, suggesting that airlines are being more cautious with adding new flights and are focusing on controlling costs. Overall, the market is healthy, but it's no longer the era of easy profits; instead, it's about competing on efficiency and quality.

2. Top Players: Air China and China Eastern Are Doing Well, While Hainan Airlines Is Struggling

There was a clear differentiation in the performance of the major airlines during this summer season. We can categorize them as "top performers" and "passing candidates":

  • Top Performer: Air China
  • Performance: It was the leader in this summer season. Its passenger turnover (the total workload of transporting passengers) increased by 11.3%, while its flight capacity only increased by 6.3%.
  • Key Point: Its passenger occupancy rate was 87.7%, up 4 percentage points year-over-year.
  • In plain language: Air China not only transported more passengers but also did so with high efficiency. It didn't blindly add more flights but instead filled its existing planes to capacity, indicating that its route planning was precise or its brand appeal was strong, allowing it to sell out all its seats.
  • Top Performer: China Eastern
  • Performance: It followed closely behind. Its flight capacity increased by 5.2%, but it transported 6.7% more passengers.
  • Key Point: Its passenger occupancy rate was 89.6%, which is very high, meaning almost every seat was occupied.
  • In plain language: China Eastern's performance was very stable, with a clear improvement in the supply-demand balance. This high occupancy rate significantly boosted its profits.
  • Passing Candidate: Hainan Airlines
  • Performance: Its flight capacity increased by 1.6%, but the number of passengers only increased by 0.3%.
  • Key Point: The improvement in its occupancy rate was limited.
  • In plain language: Hainan Airlines had a relatively quiet summer season. It flew a bit more, but didn't attract many additional passengers. This suggests that its market competitiveness or route appeal didn't keep up with the top airlines. For Hainan Airlines, improving its occupancy rate is a major challenge ahead.

3. The Biggest Highlight: International Routes Became a Lifeline and Growth Driver

Looking solely at domestic flights might suggest modest growth, but international routes were the biggest surprise of this summer season.

  • Data Comparison:
  • Air China: International passenger traffic increased by 15.4%, far exceeding the growth in its flight capacity. Its international occupancy rate also rose sharply by 5.7 percentage points.
  • China Southern Airlines: Both its international flight capacity and passenger traffic increased by about 9.5%-9.6%.
  • In plain language: Why were international routes so popular?

1. Visa Facilitation: In recent years, China has relaxed visa requirements for many countries, making travel and business trips more accessible.

2. Exchange Rate Factors: The relatively stable RMB exchange rate has encouraged outbound travel.

3. Supply Recovery: Many international routes were suspended during the pandemic and are now gradually resuming, but demand has recovered faster than supply, making them particularly sought after. For giants like Air China, China Eastern, and China Southern, international operations are a key driver of profit growth.

4. A Disappointing Trend: Jiexing and Spring Airlines Fell Behind in International Routes

There's a interesting contrast here. Although international routes were generally popular, not all airlines benefited:

  • Jiexing Airlines & Spring Airlines:
  • Jiexing: Its international passenger capacity actually decreased by 0.9%, and passenger traffic also fell slightly.
  • Spring Airlines: Its international passenger turnover decreased by 3.9%, and even more critically, its international passenger traffic dropped by 18.2%.
  • In plain language: Why did these airlines perform poorly despite the overall growth?

1. Different Focus: Spring Airlines specializes in low-cost, short-haul, and high-density domestic flights. Its international route network may not be as extensive as that of the three major airlines, or it focuses on competitive short-haul routes in Southeast Asia, which were more affected by exchange rates and competition.

2. Strategic Choices: Jiexing Airlines may be focusing more on high-quality domestic routes or specific international point-to-point flights and hasn't expanded its international network significantly.

3. Market Structure: The growth in international routes was mainly captured by "full-service airlines" with global networks that can connect to more destinations. For cost-effective airlines, if they can't compete on prices for international flights or don't have a large number of routes, it's difficult to benefit from this trend.

5. The Future Challenge: Turning Passenger Traffic into Profit

The news concludes by mentioning that the summer season has ended, and the next question is whether the increase in passenger traffic can translate into higher ticket prices and profits.

  • Current Situation:
  • Spring Airlines: Its domestic occupancy rate was as high as 94.8%, indicating a very solid domestic market with almost all seats sold out.
  • Hainan Airlines: Both domestic and international growth was slow, and its freight revenue even decreased by 7%.
  • In plain language: The summer season is a peak period, and people are willing to spend more on flights. However, after September, when the season fades, things will change.

1. Ticket Price Pressure: If international demand continues, airlines can maintain higher ticket prices. But if demand declines, they may need to lower prices to maintain occupancy rates, which will affect profits.

2. Cost Rigidity: Fuel, depreciation, and labor costs are fixed. If occupancy rates drop, the profit per ticket will decrease.

3. Next Steps: The key will be to see how much money airlines actually earn, not just how many people fly.

  • Airlines like Air China and China Eastern that can maintain high occupancy rates and prices will perform well.
  • Airlines like Hainan Airlines and Spring Airlines will need to manage their operations carefully during the off-season to protect their profits.

Summary

Overall, the aviation industry showed stable growth with structural differences this summer:

  • Winners: Airlines with strong international networks and high occupancy rates, such as Air China, China Eastern, and China Southern.
  • Challengers: Airlines with weaker international networks or slower growth, such as Hainan Airlines, Jiexing Airlines, and Spring Airlines (although Spring Airlines is strong domestically, its international performance is a weakness).
  • Trend: International travel demand is a key driver, but whether airlines can convert this traffic into profits depends on their ability to balance ticket prices and occupancy rates during the off-season.

For investors and observers, it's important to closely monitor the changes in international route occupancy rates in September and October, as these will be key indicators of the airlines' annual performance.