虎嗅

Major Baijiu (Chinese liquor) manufacturers are entering the market, driving an increase in premiumization trends. Yellow liquor (huangjiu) has potential, but not all companies will have the opportunity to benefit from this trend.

原文:白酒大商入局、高端化升温:黄酒有机会,但不是所有企业都有机会

Hello! I'm your financial news analysis assistant. This in-depth article about yellow rice wine is packed with information and presents a very rigorous logical analysis. The author is not just evaluating a single company but is dissecting a category with a three-thousand-year history that has found itself in trouble, attempting to find a way out of this predicament.

To help you understand it easily, I will break down this “technical” analysis into a core summary and a detailed interpretation from five dimensions. We will try to use plain language to explain the underlying business logic.

---

📝 Core Content Summary: What's Wrong with Yellow Rice Wine?

In one sentence:

Yellow rice wine is currently “hot,” but this popularity is a “false heat” created by distributors looking for new sources of profit, not a genuine desire from consumers to buy it.

Current Situation:

The overall scale of the yellow rice wine industry is very small (about 20 billion yuan, less than 1/37 of that of liquor), with low prices (mainstream prices ranging from 10 to 30 yuan per bottle). The majority of consumers are over 40 years old, and the market is largely confined to Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Shanghai.

Contradictions:

Leading companies like Kuaiji Mountain and Guyue Longshan are desperately trying to move towards a higher-end market and attract large distributors. Their financial reports look good, but the products are merely moving from the manufacturers’ warehouses to those of the distributors and are not actually being consumed by consumers.

Conclusion:

There is an opportunity for yellow rice wine, but the window of opportunity is only three years. The key lies not in “expanding distribution” but in “clarifying its value” and “transforming the company’s organizational structure.” If companies continue to sell yellow rice wine in the same way they sell beer or liquor, or if they stick to their traditional methods without change, they may suffer even more after this wave of popularity subsides.

---

🔍 Detailed Interpretation from Five Dimensions

1. Industry Overview: Why is Yellow Rice Wine “Small, Cheap, and Targeted at an Older Audience?”

[Plain Language Explanation: It’s Not That the Wine Is Bad, but It’s Restricted]

The article provides a harsh assessment of the yellow rice wine industry using four sets of data:

  • Small Scale: Liquor generates 740 billion yuan, beer 180 billion yuan, while yellow rice wine only 20 billion yuan. This is like a large mall where liquor is Walmart, beer is Carrefour, and yellow rice wine is just a small street vendor.
  • Low Prices: Mainstream yellow rice wine costs 15 yuan per bottle, leaving manufacturers with a profit of only about 3 yuan after costs. With such meager profits, how can they invest in research and development, advertising, or educating consumers? This creates a vicious cycle where lower prices lead to less investment, which in turn results in even lower prices.
  • Narrow Market: The audience for yellow rice wine is very limited:
  • Geographical: People outside Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Shanghai are largely unaware of it. The market has barely expanded by 11 percentage points in ten years.
  • Age: The majority of consumers are older adults; the younger generation (Generation Z) has a尝试 rate of only 12%.
  • Usage Context: Liquor is often associated with social status, beer with refreshment, and red wine with sophistication. It’s unclear what role yellow rice wine plays in these contexts, and it’s difficult to find it at business dinners.
  • Taste: Many people find yellow rice wine to have a medicinal taste or a poor quality. This is often due to over-industrialization and a lack of innovation.

[Journalist’s Comment: The biggest enemy of yellow rice wine is not its competitors but a “supply-side mindset.” Manufacturers focus on producing and distributing the wine but never consider how to appeal to, for example, a 25-year-old consumer.

2. Review of the Top Five Companies: Which One Is Struggling the Most?

[Plain Language Explanation: Some Are Calling for Help, Some Are Spending Money to Buy Time, Some Are Just Holding Their Ground]

The article compares the five leading companies and highlights their respective issues:

  • Guyue Longshan (Defensive): Revenue is declining, and profits have halved.
  • Problem: Too many brands (five in total), leading to a dispersion of resources. It’s like fighting five battles simultaneously without winning any. The company is trying to cover up its lack of depth by expanding its market reach.
  • Kuaiji Mountain (Aggressive): Its financial reports look good, with growing revenue and profits. However, this growth is achieved through spending money and pushing products through distributors; the products are still not reaching consumers.
  • Challenge: Using strategies from the beer and fast-moving consumer goods industries (high turnover, heavy advertising) to sell yellow rice wine, which does not build a strong brand.
  • Tapa Brand (Museum-style): It has the best quality and reputation and exports a lot. However, its production capacity is limited, and it serves more as a “museum of the category,” unable to drive the industry’s growth.
  • Jinfeng Wine Industry: Losing money and facing negative cash flow, even losing its base in Shanghai.
  • Issue: It blames competitors but fails to address its own problems, such as an inability to sell its higher-end products effectively.
  • Shazhou Youhuang (Comfort Zone): Doing well in Jiangsu but reluctant to expand due to high local profits.

[Journalist’s Comment: None of these companies have truly focused on the end-consumer. Their KPIs focus on sales and distribution, not customer loyalty or repeat purchases. This is why products are sold, but the company fails to retain customers.

3. Learning from Japan’s Sake: How Did It Turn Things Around?

[Plain Language Explanation: Sake Didn’t Change, but the Way It Was Marketed Did]

The article compares yellow rice wine to Japanese sake, which provides valuable insights:

  • Sake’s Challenges: Once a local, niche drink for the elderly, its production had plummeted.
  • Sake’s Success: It rebranded itself by:

1. Creating buzz around technical terms like “refined rice processing.”

2. Establishing quality levels (e.g., “pure rice daiginjo”).

3. Defining usage contexts (e.g., serving temperature, taste categories) and integrating it with Japanese cuisine.

  • Result: Sake’s exports have surpassed those of yellow rice wine by several times.

[Journalist’s Comment: Yellow rice wine has a stronger foundation (3000-year history, natural compatibility with Chinese food, health benefits), but it still focuses on its history, while sake focuses on its lifestyle. The difference lies in the ability to communicate these values to consumers.

4. The Three-Year Window of Opportunity: How to Seize It?

[Plain Language Explanation: The Trend Is Here, but Only Those Who Are Ready Will Fly]

The author believes there is an opportunity for yellow rice wine, but it’s a “structural” one, not a general market boom:

  • Three Opportunities:

1. The growing market for low-alcohol drinks; yellow rice wine is naturally low-alcohol and suitable for this trend.

2. Distributors seeking new profit sources; they are willing to promote higher-end yellow rice wine due to its higher margins.

3. A price gap in the market (300-800 yuan) as liquor and red wine markets shrink.

  • Key Factor: This trend is driven by distributors, not consumers. The window of opportunity is only three years. If companies cannot educate consumers and build loyalty within this time, the opportunity will pass.

[Journalist’s Comment: Just because yellow rice wine is popular doesn’t mean all companies will profit. Only those that understand consumers, invest in education, and clearly communicate its value will benefit. Others may just watch from the sidelines while their products sit on shelves.

5. Guidance for Breaking the Pattern: Five Dos and Don’ts for Companies**

[Plain Language Explanation: Practical Advice for Yellow Rice Wine Companies]

The author offers specific recommendations:

  • Focus on Value, Not History: Stop talking about its 3000-year history; instead, highlight how the wine pairs well with dishes or its health benefits.
  • Provide Training: Establish training programs for distributors and salespeople to better explain the value of yellow rice wine.
  • Reevaluate Metrics: Shift from focusing on sales to customer loyalty and bottle opening rates.
  • Set Examples: Focus on a few key cities (e.g., Sichuan, Henan, Guangdong) to establish successful models before expanding.
  • Control Inventory: Produce based on sales and strictly avoid overstocking. Stop production immediately if prices drop.

[Journalist’s Comment: The most critical point is to avoid becoming “martyrs of traditional culture.” Many companies mistake conservatism for authenticity, but the market cares about whether the wine meets consumer needs today, not about its historical significance. What yellow rice wine needs are innovators who can make it relevant to modern consumers.

---

📌 Conclusion

This article serves as a wake-up call for the yellow rice wine industry: The current popularity is driven by distributors, not consumers. If companies continue with their traditional approaches, they may face even more serious inventory issues and brand erosion after the trend fades.

The real opportunities lie in:

1. Clearly communicating the value of yellow rice wine to consumers.

2. Transforming the company’s organizational structure to focus on customer needs.

3. Being patient and investing in consumer education over short-term growth.

Yellow rice wine has a long history, but what it needs now are people who understand and can bring it into the present.