第一财经

Major central banks have raised interest rates one after another, so why has the Bank of England remained inactive?

原文:主要央行纷纷加息,英国央行为何按兵不动?

Hello! I'm your financial news analysis assistant. Today, we're going to discuss a very "tough decision" just made by the Bank of England.

In simple terms, the Bank of England has decided to stay put and keep interest rates at 3.75%. This is already the sixth time in a row that they have maintained this rate.

But it's not that simple. On one hand, prices are still rising (inflation hasn't been completely controlled), and on the other hand, the economy might not be able to handle excessively high interest rates. What's more interesting is that, despite the decision not to raise rates, the market reacted as if it had breathed a sigh of relief: the pound fell, stocks went up, and bonds also rose.

Below, I'll break down this news into five parts that everyone can understand to help you grasp the details behind it.

---

1. The Core Issue: Why Didn't They Raise Rates When They Should Have?

In plain language: Although prices are a bit high, the central bank believes the current level of interest rates is sufficient and raising them further could be harmful to the economy.

First, let's look at the outcome: the Bank of England voted 6-3 to keep interest rates at 3.75% unchanged.

You might be wondering, didn't the news mention that the inflation rate (CPI) in August rose to 3.1%, significantly higher than the target of 2%? Even the bank's chief economist voted against raising rates. So why didn't they do it?

It's like you're trying to lose weight (control inflation), and your weight (prices) is still above the target.

  • The opposition (3 members) said: “Look, you're still 1.1 pounds overweight, and 0.7 pounds of that is due to eating too many high-calorie foods (rising energy costs and oil prices). There's a war in the Middle East, so oil prices will likely continue to rise, and inflation could exceed 4% next year. We need to take more drastic measures (raise rates)!”
  • The majority (6 members) said: “Don’t rush. Our current interest rate of 3.75% is already much higher than the neutral level (about 3%). The effects of the previous tightening measures are starting to show. Moreover, this increase in prices is mainly due to temporary factors like energy, unlike in the U.S., where it's caused by excessive demand for AI equipment. Since we're already using a strong dose of the ‘medicine’ (high interest rates), raising it even more could damage the economy.”

So, the bank chose to wait and see, betting that the inflation caused by energy prices is temporary rather than permanent.

2. Market Reaction: Why Did the Market Cheer Because They Didn't Raise Rates?

In plain language: People expected a rate hike, but since it didn't happen, they felt relieved, and money flowed back into the stock market.

The market's reaction after the decision was quite interesting:

  • The pound fell: Since rates didn't rise, the appeal of holding pounds decreased, and people sold them.
  • Stocks rose: The FTSE 100 index jumped 1.19%. Why? High interest rates are harmful to the stock market because they increase the cost of borrowing, reducing corporate profits. The bank's decision not to raise rates meant that companies faced less financing pressure, making stocks more attractive to investors.
  • Bonds rose (yields fell): Bond yields decreased, meaning bond prices increased. Investors expected interest rates not to rise significantly in the future, making bonds more appealing.

It's like a student who thought the teacher would assign more homework (raise rates) but then the teacher said the amount of homework would remain the same. The students (investors) went from anxious to happy and started buying riskier assets like stocks.

3. Comparing the Situations: Why Is the UK More Cautious Than the U.S. and Europe?

In plain language: Each country has different underlying problems, so the solutions are different. The UK has a “cold and feverish” situation, while the U.S. has an “overactive metabolism.”

The news compares the Bank of England with the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank, which is very interesting:

  • The U.S. (Federal Reserve): They just raised rates because inflation in the U.S. is mainly driven by the AI investment boom. This demand is real; people are actually spending money on servers and data centers. This kind of overheated demand is difficult to curb without high interest rates.
  • The Eurozone (European Central Bank): They just raised rates because the current interest rate (2%) is close to the neutral level, so there's room for further increases.
  • The UK (Bank of England): They decided to stay put.
  • Different starting points: The UK's current interest rate of 3.75% is already much higher than its “comfort zone” (3%). Raising rates further would have diminishing effects and more side effects.
  • Different causes of inflation: The UK's inflation is mainly due to energy prices (the Middle East conflict and oil prices), which are highly affected by external geopolitics and are temporary and volatile. The bank believes that by monitoring energy prices, inflation will naturally fall without the need for drastic measures.

In other words, the U.S. is like someone who has eaten too much and needs to lose weight, while the UK is like someone whose body temperature has risen due to external factors; the temperature will return to normal once the wind stops.

4. Governor Bailey's Subtle Signal: Saying No to Raising Rates, but Hinting at the Possibility Later On?

In plain language: Although rates didn't rise this time, the governor left the door open: “If oil prices don't fall, we will raise them next time.”

The words of Andrew Bailey, the governor of the Bank of England, are quite subtle:

  • Admitting the issue: He acknowledged that inflation is falling faster than expected, but the Middle East conflict has increased energy price volatility, and inflation could rebound later this year.
  • Setting a boundary: In a letter to the Chancellor, he emphasized that the longer the energy price fluctuations continue, the more necessary it will be to raise rates.
  • Tough stance: He and three of his deputy governors mentioned the possibility of raising rates in the future.

This sends a signal to the market that the current decision not to raise rates is temporary, not permanent. If oil prices continue to rise in the coming months and inflation exceeds 4%, a rate hike is almost certain.

However, market traders are less worried now. They previously expected two rate hikes this year, but now they think one would be enough, with a 50-50 chance. This suggests that the market believes the bank's caution is reasonable, and some of the risks have been mitigated.

5. The Hidden Move: The “Soft” Approach to Quantitative Tightening (QT)

In plain language: The bank is not only focusing on interest rates but also quietly managing its bond portfolio. This time, it decided not to sell bonds aggressively but to gradually reduce its holdings, which is good news for the long-term bond market.

Another important decision from the meeting was to adjust the approach to quantitative tightening (QT):

  • Background: The Bank of England still holds £488 billion in government bonds (purchased to support the market). It now plans to slowly sell them to reduce its bond portfolio.
  • New plan:
  • Short-term bonds: Bonds maturing by 2035 (worth £222 billion) will be left to mature naturally without being sold.
  • Ultra-long-term bonds: Bonds with the longest maturity (worth £120 billion) will be retained for currency issuance purposes.
  • **Medium-term bonds (the focus): Bonds maturing between 2035 and 2049 (worth £146 billion) will no longer be sold through public auctions but will be handled directly by the Government Debt Office (DMO).
  • Impact:
  • Pausing sales: This means the bank will temporarily stop selling long-term bonds (such as 20- and 30-year bonds) in the market.
  • Good news for long-term bonds: Previously, the market was concerned that the bank would sell too many long-term bonds, causing prices to plummet. Now, by saying it won't sell them, the supply pressure on long-term bonds is reduced, and prices have stabilized or even risen.
  • No change in policy: Although the approach has become more gentle, the bank still aims to reduce its bond holdings (except for the £120 billion). Therefore, the overall direction of monetary policy (tightening) remains unchanged; it's just a adjustment in the pace.

In summary, the Bank of England's actions can be described as: **“Tactical pause, strategic vigilance, and flexible approach.”

  • Tactically: They decided not to raise rates because energy-induced inflation is temporary and current interest rates are already high.
  • Strategically: Governor Bailey has repeatedly stated that if inflation doesn't decrease, rate hikes could still happen at any time, indicating a hawkish stance.
  • Operationally: By adjusting the QT approach, the bank has alleviated pressure on the long-term bond market, providing some reassurance to the market.

For ordinary people, this means:

1. Mortgage rates: They are unlikely to rise significantly in the short term, but they also won't fall and will likely remain high.

2. Investments: The stock market has risen due to improved expectations, but risks (such as the Middle East conflict and oil prices) still exist.

3. Key factors to watch: The next few months will depend on oil prices and the UK's budget. If oil prices continue to soar, the Bank of England is likely to raise rates again this year.