UC's Reconsideration of Standardized Tests: A Warning to All Applicants
Hello everyone, I'm your financial journalist and economist. Today, we're not talking about some boring stock market news, but rather a significant policy reversal happening in the American higher education landscape.
In simple terms, the University of California (UC), one of the top public universities in the United States, is considering reinstating the SAT/ACT standardized tests that it had previously abolished.
This isn't just about whether or not these tests will be required; it reflects a fierce debate surrounding educational equity and the selection of elite students, and it's something that applicants from around the world, especially Chinese students, must take seriously.
Below, I'll break down this complex issue into five key aspects to help you fully understand the implications of this decision.
---
1. The Policy U-turn: From Full Abolition to Regret
Six years ago (in 2020), the UC Board of Regents voted 23-0 to eliminate the requirement for standardized test scores for applicants, under the rationale of promoting educational equity and preventing minority and new immigrant students from being marginalized due to a lack of preparation resources. However, the situation has taken a dramatic turn in 2024.
1. Professors' Appeal for Change
In June this year, over 2,300 science and engineering professors signed a letter calling for the reinstatement of SAT/ACT math scores for STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) applicants starting from the 2027 application cycle. Nearly 900 humanities professors also joined in, advocating for the inclusion of reading and language scores as well.
- The Problem: Professors have observed a sharp decline in the academic proficiency of freshmen. A report from UCSD (University of California, San Diego) showed that the number of freshmen with math skills below high school level has increased by nearly 30 times. One professor even commented, "Some freshmen don't even understand middle school math."
2. Board Members' Repentance
At a recent UC Board of Regents meeting, a member who had voted to abolish the tests admitted, "I regret my decision. It might have been a mistake."
The Current Situation: Although the board has not made a final decision (expected by June 2027), the trend is clear—reinstating the tests is becoming the mainstream. The top 20 universities have already withdrawn their commitments to make the tests optional.
Analysis: It's like a restaurant that removed the tasting menu, only to realize that many customers couldn't handle the more challenging dishes, leading to both poor service and customer dissatisfaction. The board and professors have realized that, despite their good intentions, the policy led to a decline in academic quality.
---
2. The Double-edged Sword of Equity
The initial reason for abolishing the tests was to promote equity. Rich families could afford private tutors and retake the tests to achieve high scores, while poorer families couldn't. Abolishing the tests seemed to give disadvantaged students a fairer chance.
But the reality is more harsh:
- The New Inequality: Without standardized tests, universities rely on extracurricular activities, recommendations, and essays to evaluate students. Rich students can engage in philanthropy, conduct research in top labs, and have professional guidance to create a perfect profile, while poorer students may struggle with daily life and lack the time for such activities.
- GPA Inflation: Without external benchmarks, high school GPAs have inflated. ACT data shows that the average GPA increased from 3.22 to 3.39 between 2010 and 2021, with the proportion of A's rising from 46.8% to 54.9%, even though the average ACT score decreased. For example, UCSD freshmen who needed to catch up on middle school math had a GPA of 3.65.
- Conclusion: High GPAs no longer indicate true academic ability; they may simply reflect lenient grading. Universities are receiving applications with many A's, making it harder to distinguish between truly talented students and those from less prestigious schools.
---
3. The Loss of Academic Standards
This shift has raised concerns that universities are becoming mere cram schools. Universities are not meant to be preparatory classes for college; they should provide a higher level of education.
Consequences:
- Disrupted Teaching: Professors have to spend extra time teaching basic concepts that should have been covered in high school, wasting both their and students' time.
- Poor Student Experience: Many students who are admitted to prestigious schools struggle with assignments and keep up with the curriculum, leading to increased anxiety and dropout rates, damaging the university's reputation.
- Admissions Challenges: Admissions officers struggle to assess students' true abilities when they receive applications with only A's.
---
4. The Hidden Barrier for Chinese Students
For Chinese applicants, this news is particularly important:
- **The Truth About “Optional Tests”: The so-called “optional” policy is misleading. American admissions officers are familiar with the backgrounds of local students, but Chinese students' GPA scores may not be reliable due to differences in grading standards. Standardized test scores are a crucial tool for demonstrating academic ability.
- The Rising Bar: While many schools claim the tests are optional, the reality is different. To get into top 20 universities, you now need high SAT/ACT scores and perfect GPAs.
- Advice: Don't rely on luck; focus on building strong academic skills. Prepare for the tests and invest in essays and extracurricular activities that showcase your abilities and commitment.
---
5. The Future Trend: Back to Hard Skills
This reversal suggests a shift towards a focus on academic ability. While standardized tests are returning, it's important to remember that they are just one part of the application process.
Future Directions:
- Educational Reorientation: American education is moving from emphasizing soft skills to focusing on hard skills. The return of standardized tests indicates that universities value a solid academic foundation.
- Differentiation: With GPAs and test scores becoming the norm, the focus shifts to essays and extracurricular activities that reflect a student's unique strengths and impact on society.
- Advice for Applicants: Ensure you have strong standardized test scores and use your essays and activities to demonstrate your responsibility, gratitude, and ability to solve real-world problems.
In summary, UC's reconsideration of standardized tests is a reflection on the effectiveness of its previous equity measures. For American students, it means that superficial academic achievements won't suffice. For Chinese students, standardized tests remain a vital tool for proving their academic competence. For all applicants, it's essential to focus on building a solid academic foundation and demonstrating genuine abilities.
Remember: Standardized tests measure your academic foundation; essays reflect your true character. Without them, even the best efforts may not be enough to stand out.