The "Power Struggles" and "Calculations" Behind the Fed's Rate Hikes: An In-Depth Explanation in Plain Language
Hello everyone, I'm your financial journalist. Today's article about the Fed's September interest rate meeting is packed with valuable information and is presented in a very accessible way. It doesn't overwhelm you with complicated macroeconomic models but rather places the Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, President Donald Trump, and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen within the context of "workplace politics" and "family relationships," making the intricacies of the rate hikes clear.
In simple terms, the 25-basis-point (0.25%) rate hike seems to be a response to poor economic data, but in reality, it's a carefully calculated "political compromise" and a move to stabilize the market.
Below, I'll summarize the key points of the article and break them down into five aspects for you in plain language.
---
Summary of Key Points
The main argument of the article is that Trump's tolerance for Fed Chairman Powell is much higher than it was for his predecessor, Jerome Powell. The reason lies not in monetary policy itself but in the concepts of "loyalty" and "control."
The rate hike was not due to out-of-control inflation but was aimed at resolving conflicts among the three key players:
1. Trump wants low interest rates to boost the economy and win votes, but he cares more about whether officials follow his orders.
2. Yellen is concerned about the soaring costs of government borrowing due to rising long-term interest rates.
3. Powell needs to rebuild market confidence in the Fed's ability to combat inflation and prevent long-term interest rates from getting out of control.
In the end, a compromise was reached: a short-term rate hike (a hawkish stance) to stabilize long-term interest rates and lower borrowing costs. This hike was more of a "necessary step" to align with market expectations rather than a strict measure to curb inflation. In the coming months, as the pressure of AI-related investments on long-term debt increases and the midterms approach, the tension between the Fed and the White House is likely to intensify.
---
Detailed Explanation
1. Trump's "Double Standards": Why Does He Criticize Powell but Praise Powell?
Many people are confused by Trump's changing attitude. He used to criticize Powell harshly, almost to the point of demanding his resignation. But why does he now say he "respects Powell" and let him do his job?
The article explains that the motivation is not economic but rather about "loyalty":
- To Powell (predecessor): Public humiliation and criticism. Powell was appointed during Trump's first term but repeatedly refused his requests for rate cuts, especially in the weeks before the 2024 election, which Trump saw as helping Biden. In Trump's eyes, a Fed chairman cannot be dismissed as easily as a secretary of state, so he resorted to extreme public attacks.
- To Powell (current): Private pressure and public support. Powell was chosen during Trump's second term and is considered "one of his own." Trump's approach with him is different: he pressures him privately but publicly shows trust and support. The reason for choosing Powell over more dovish candidates like Christopher Hassett or Richard Wolle is that Trump needs someone who is both obedient (politically loyal) and does not appear to make the Fed too subservient to the White House (as that would harm its independence).
Popular analogy:
It's like a boss. For a capable but rebellious employee (Powell), the boss publicly criticizes them to make them uncomfortable and force them to leave or understand the consequences. For a newly promoted loyalist (Powell), the boss privately ensures they listen but publicly demonstrates trust in their judgment.
2. The "Interest Rate Gap" and How They Resolved the Conflict
There seems to be a contradiction: Trump wants low interest rates for the stock market and jobs, yet the Fed raised rates. How did Trump accept this hike?
The article explains this through the concept of the "term structure of interest rates":
- Short-term rates (e.g., 2 years): Primarily influenced by Fed policy.
- Long-term rates (e.g., 10, 30 years): Affected by market supply and demand and inflation expectations. These rates are crucial for businesses and governments borrowing money and for individuals buying homes.
Treasury Secretary Yellen plays a key role in mediating this conflict. She is most worried about rising long-term interest rates, as they would increase the cost of government borrowing. She supports Powell's rate hike because it helps stabilize long-term rates and prevents inflation expectations from getting out of control.
Popular analogy:
Imagine your home renovation. The homeowner (Trump) wants to spend less (low interest rates), but the designer (Powell) says if the plan isn't followed (no rate hike), the house will leak (inflation) and future repairs will be more expensive (higher long-term rates). The contractor (Yellen) calculates that fixing the leaks now (rate hike) is cheaper than replacing the entire roof later.
3. The Inconvenience of Having to Raise Rates: Market Pricing Forces the Fed's Action
The Fed was reluctant to raise rates, but it had to. The article explains this as a case of being "held hostage" by the market:
- July's Mistake: After Powell took office, he deliberately kept his policies vague, leading to market confusion and a surge in long-term rates.
- August's Attempt: Powell had to speak more hawkishly at the Jackson Hole meeting to restore market confidence, but Wall Street was still skeptical.
- September's Dilemma: By the September meeting, the market had already priced in a 90% chance of a rate hike. If the Fed didn't raise rates, it would cause a sharp market drop. If it did, it would stabilize markets. Therefore, raising rates 25 basis points was a way to avoid greater turmoil.
Popular analogy:
It's like a parent educating a child. The parent (Fed) didn't want to punish the child, but previous vague statements led to misbehavior (rate fluctuations). By the end of the month, the child expected a punishment, so the parent had to impose it to maintain authority and order.
4. Are Rate Hikes Really Effective? The Underlying Logic
The article analyzes four key reasons behind the hike, emphasizing that it was more about politics and credibility:
1. Restoring Credibility: The Fed needed to show it was serious through hawkish rhetoric and actions.
2. Oil Prices and Inflation: The White House blames oil prices for inflation, but the Fed believes that inaction would lead to self-fulfilling inflation expectations.
3. The Impact of AI Investments: AI-related investments are driving up long-term debt and interest rates. The hike is to cool down these investments and prevent a bubble.
4. High Growth and Inflation: The U.S. economy is experiencing high growth, similar to China's in 2002-2008. High growth inevitably leads to inflation, and long-term high interest rates are needed to manage it.
Popular analogy:
The economy is like a car speeding on the highway. The driver (Fed) notices the brakes are overheating (inflation). The passenger (Trump) wants to go faster, but the car's components (debt) are at risk. Raising the brakes slightly (rate hike) is to prevent a more serious problem.
5. The Future: The December Test and Trump's Patience
The article looks ahead to December, when the next major test awaits. This rate hike is just a temporary solution, not a permanent fix:
- Short-term (October): With midterms approaching, data is unlikely to change significantly, so Powell may wait and not raise rates to please Trump.
- Long-term (December and beyond): If inflation persists or AI investments continue to drive up rates, Powell may have to raise rates again. The conflict between Trump's desire for low rates and the Fed's need to control inflation will be crucial. Will Trump criticize Powell as he did Powell?
The article suggests that Powell needs to show political wisdom, explaining to Trump that the hikes are for his own benefit—to lower borrowing costs and ensure fiscal stability. As long as Yellen continues to support these measures, Trump may tolerate the Fed's actions. However, if the market sees the Fed as weak, Trump's patience could run out, putting the Fed's independence at risk.
Popular analogy:
The driver (Fed) had to raise the brakes slightly to avoid a bigger problem. Trump may tolerate it for now, but if inflation persists, the driver will have to act again.
---
Conclusion
This article shows that monetary policy is not just about economics but a complex interplay of politics, market psychology, and fiscal constraints. For everyone, it's important to understand this:
- Don't just look at interest rates: Consider who is making the decisions and their motivations.
- Pay attention to long-term rates: They reflect the real costs and risks of the economy.
- Be wary of politicized central banks: When central bank leaders cater to political demands, market volatility increases, as policies are driven by politics rather than economics.
This rate hike was a successful attempt at crisis management, but it's not the end of the issue. December will be a critical test of the stability of this tripartite relationship.