虎嗅

Behind the luxury homes in Argentina: For the right-wing in Silicon Valley, the "motherland" is merely a tool

原文:阿根廷豪宅背后:对硅谷右翼来说,“祖国”只是工具

Summary of Key Points

Peter Thiel’s purchase of a luxury mansion in Argentina and his frequent meetings with Mauricio Macri are not signs of “defection from the United States” or “seeking refuge from an apocalypse.” Instead, they represent another step in his implementation of the concept of the “sovereign individual”—using nation-states as tools to profit globally (in places with lower taxes and less stringent regulation). His relationship with Donald Trump is one of mutual benefit. The tech right wing is not a faction beholden to Trump; rather, it is a product of late-stage capitalism’s attempt at self-rescue: capital clings to American power and resources while seeking “backup countries” as a safety net, all with the ultimate goal of freeing itself from democratic constraints and expanding freely.

I. Who is Peter Thiel? The “Kingmaker” of the Tech Right Wing and His Three Core Ideologies

Thiel is no ordinary billionaire; he is an influential figure in Silicon Valley’s power circle: co-founder of PayPal, the first external investor in Facebook, chairman of Palantir (a company that provides surveillance data for the U.S. government), and a significant donor and mentor to Vice President Mike Pence. His philosophy is not simply about laissez-faire; rather, it consists of three interlocking layers of thought:

1. Capital vs. Democracy: Thiel believes that freedom and democracy are incompatible. He argues that voting by the public leads to increased taxation and regulation of capital, which hinders its profitability, thus advocating for power to be in the hands of a elite few.

2. Technological Accelerationism: The tech giants of his generation are dissatisfied with the status quo (e.g., having only social media but no flying cars). They believe that regulation and bureaucracy are holding back progress and advocate for rapid development of technologies such as AI and cryptocurrencies, regardless of ethical concerns.

3. Utilizing the State as a Tool: While publicly opposing the government, Thiel sees it as a source of revenue (through contracts with agencies like the CIA and the Department of Defense) while also seeking to avoid its regulatory constraints.

Thiel’s influence extends beyond his wealth; he has used his resources to support politicians, publish influential publications, and cultivate talent, gradually pushing far-right ideas into the core of the Republican Party (e.g., with Pence becoming vice president). The tech and defense agendas in Washington are deeply influenced by him.

II. Why Argentina? Not for Escaping the End of the World, but as a Testing Ground for Profit-Making Strategies

Thiel’s choice of Argentina is not whimsical; it reflects the principles outlined in his book “The Sovereign Individual.” In the information age, elites can choose not to be loyal to any one country and treat them all as providers of services. He already holds New Zealand citizenship and a Maltese passport. His decision to move to Argentina is driven by:

1. Macri’s Pro-Policy Agenda: Macri’s policies (such as deregulation, tax cuts, and privatization of state-owned enterprises) align with Thiel’s desire for less regulation and more freedom, making Argentina an ideal testing ground.

2. Tax Pressure in California: California is considering a 5% wealth tax on billionaires, which poses a significant financial burden for someone with Thiel’s wealth. Argentina offers a way to avoid such taxes.

3. Asset Diversification: His $28 billion fortune is just a fraction of his total assets, and his companies and political influence remain in the United States. Moving to Argentina is more like acquiring an overseas property as a risk mitigation strategy, rather than planning for immigration.

III. The Myth of “Abandoning Trump”: They Have Always Been Utilizing Each Other

Media reports of the tech right wing “abandoning” Trump misinterpret their relationship as emotional loyalty. Their cooperation was always based on mutual benefit:

1. Trump’s Support for Their Goals: Trump has implemented policies that align with Thiel’s interests, such as relaxing regulations on AI and cryptocurrencies and cutting taxes, as well as providing government contracts to companies like Palantir.

2. Temporary Disagreements Over Common Interests: Even conflicts (like those between Elon Musk and Trump) are temporary due to ongoing economic ties. While Thiel has moved to Argentina, his companies continue to receive American contracts, and Pence remains in office.

3. Focusing on the System, Not on Individuals: The tech right wing has built a network of politicians (including Pence) over the years; Trump is just one of many they can rely on. Even if Trump were to leave office, others would take his place, ensuring their influence continues.

IV. The Essence of the Tech Right Wing: Self-Rescue in Late-Stage Capitalism

The tech right wing is not a temporary faction that emerged with Trump; it represents a response to systemic challenges in capitalism:

  • Declining Globalization: Traditional investment returns are low, so capital is seeking new ways to grow, often through AI and cryptocurrencies.
  • Great Power Rivalry: To maintain technological monopolies, capital needs to control state institutions (by securing government contracts and influencing policies).
  • A Dual Strategy of Control and Retreat: They hold onto American power while establishing backups like Argentina to minimize risks, thereby freeing capital from democratic constraints and maximizing their profits.

In summary, Thiel’s move to Argentina is not about betrayal but about pursuing his long-held goal of using nations as tools for global profit-making. In their world, there are no concepts of “motherland” or “loyalty”; only interests and strategies for gaining an advantage.

Final Conclusion

Thiel’s luxury mansion in Argentina is not a ticket to escape, but rather a new membership card for capital elites to exploit global opportunities. In their worldview, there are no absolutes like “patriotism” or “faithfulness”—only tactics for achieving maximum gain.