虎嗅

Nike's Market Value Shrank by Trillions in Five Years: How Did It Self-Destroy?

原文:耐克五年蒸发万亿市值,它是怎么把自己打废的?

Summary of Key Points

Over the past five years, Nike's market value has shrunk by 70%. In the Chinese market, it has gone from being highly sought after to struggling to sell even at discounted prices, while domestic sports brands such as Li Ning and Anta have experienced a rise against the trend. This change is due to Nike's own missteps, the significant improvement of domestic brands, and a fundamental shift in Chinese consumers' preferences—no longer blindly chasing foreign brands, but placing more emphasis on value for money, national fashion trends, and the suitability of products.

Detailed Analysis

1. The Xinjiang Cotton Incident: Nike Damaged Its Own Chance in China

The Xinjiang cotton incident in 2021 marked a critical turning point for Nike's decline in China. Nike publicly stated that it would not use Xinjiang cotton and demanded that its suppliers do the same, which struck a chord with Chinese consumers' national sentiments. "You make money from Chinese people, yet you don't respect our industry and dignity—why should we buy your products?" Following the incident, many celebrities withdrew their endorsements, and consumers began to boycott Nike. Nike's sales and reputation plummeted. Although the company later tried to recover through discounts, the damage to its image was irreversible, and this became the first domino in its downward trajectory in the Chinese market.

2. The Rise of Domestic Brands: From Imitators to Leaders

Previously, domestic sports brands were seen as "rustic" and of poor quality, but now the situation has reversed:

  • Fashionable Design: Li Ning's "Chinese Li Ning" series incorporates Chinese characters and elements from the Forbidden City into its clothing and footwear, making its designs popular among young people. Anta and FILA (a brand it acquired) also produce increasingly stylish products that better reflect the aesthetics of Chinese consumers.
  • Advanced Technology: Anta's "Nitrogen Tech" running shoes are lighter and more flexible than Nike's React foam technology, while Li Ning's "䨻 Tech" is comparable to Nike's Zoom cushioning. These technologies are available in mid-to-low-end products, making them affordable for the general public.
  • Competitive Prices: A pair of Nike running shoes can cost over 1000 yuan, even at a discount, while similar domestic brands sell for 300–500 yuan, offering better value for money.

3. Smarter Consumers: No Longer Willing to Pay for Foreign Brand Premiums

In the past, many people bought Nike because it represented prestige. However, today's consumers focus on practicality:

  • Quality Over Brand: They prefer products that are comfortable, stylish, and offer good value for money, regardless of whether they are domestic or imported. For example, many professional athletes wear Anta basketball shoes, proving their quality.
  • National Fashion Trends: Wearing Li Ning's "Chinese Li Ning" reflects personal style and cultural confidence, especially among the post-95s and post-00s generations who strongly identify with national trends.
  • Understanding Consumer Needs: Domestic brands better cater to Asian foot shapes (e.g., wider, softer soles) and design products tailored to Chinese sports activities like square dancing and brisk walking.

4. Nike's Lack of Innovation and Overpriced Products

Nike has struggled with innovation in recent years:

  • Boring Designs: The Air Jordan line remains largely the same classic designs, with new models either looking unattractive or barely different from older ones.
  • Slow Technological Progress: Technologies like Zoom cushioning have not seen significant improvements, whereas domestic brands release new innovations annually.
  • Arrogant Pricing: Despite declining sales, Nike continues to charge high prices, making its products more expensive than similar domestic options. For example, a basic Nike shoe costs 899 yuan before a discount, while a similar domestic brand sells for 399 yuan.

5. Domestic Brands Outperform Nike in Distribution Channels

Domestic brands are more flexible in their distribution strategies:

  • Online Sales: Li Ning and Anta excel in live streaming sales on platforms like TikTok and Taobao, where hosts provide detailed product information and offer discounts (e.g., buy one get one free, 100 yuan off orders over 300 yuan), attracting many young consumers.
  • Offline Presence: Domestic brands have a wide range of stores in lower-tier cities and counties, while Nike's stores are mainly concentrated in larger cities. This makes it difficult for Nike to reach rural areas, leading to increased inventory buildup and the need for frequent discounts.

Conclusion

Nike's decline is not accidental; it results from a combination of its own mistakes, lack of innovation, the rise of competitive brands, and changing consumer preferences. Domestic sports brands have succeeded by understanding their customers' needs, focusing on innovation, and offering high-quality products at reasonable prices. In the future, Chinese consumers are likely to spend more money on reliable, considerate, and culturally relevant brands—whether domestic or imported. Clearly, domestic brands are taking the lead.