第一财经

Merck Invests $10 Billion to Expand Its Life Sciences Division, Stating That the Valuation is Reasonable

原文:默克百亿美元投资拓展生命科学板块,称估值处于合理水平

Summary of Key Points

German pharmaceutical company Merck has acquired U.S.-based Bio-Techne for $11.3 billion, marking its largest acquisition in over a decade with the aim of expanding its life science tools business. This year, there has been a surge in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) within the biopharmaceutical industry, with numerous deals worth billions of dollars. The underlying reason is the “patent cliff” pressure that forces pharmaceutical companies to accelerate their investment in new drug development pipelines. Strong cash flows have enabled these giants to make such large-scale purchases, and it is likely that M&A activity will continue to grow in the future.

1. Merck’s $11.3 Billion Acquisition: Focusing on Life Science Tools to Fill Business Gaps

Merck’s investment in Bio-Techne is the first major deal under the leadership of its new CEO, Beckerman. Bio-Techne specializes in providing essential tools for新药 research and development, such as reagents, proteins, antibodies, and analytical instruments that are crucial for the development of complex drugs like cell and gene therapies.

Why did Merck make this acquisition? Firstly, the market for Bio-Techne’s products is worth $27 billion, and the company owns a portfolio of 6,000 proteins and 425,000 antibodies, which can help Merck gain a larger share in the life science sector. Secondly, Merck wants to strengthen its position in cell and gene therapy technologies, as this is a key area for future drug development. Following the acquisition, Bio-Techne’s stock price rose by nearly 20%, and so did Merck’s stock by 5%, indicating market approval of the deal.

2. The M&A Boom This Year: Billion-Dollar Deals Abound

The biopharmaceutical industry has seen a particularly active M&A scene this year, especially in June, with several deals worth billions of dollars:

  • AbbVie acquired Apogee for $10.9 billion to gain access to a potential long-acting treatment for atopic dermatitis.
  • GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) bought Nuvalent for $10.6 billion to enhance its cancer drug research pipeline.

Together with Merck’s acquisition, these are some of the largest deals in the biotechnology sector this year.

The total value of M&A transactions in the first quarter of this year reached $84 billion, nearly doubling from the same period last year, making it the strongest quarter since 2019. Giants like Eli Lilly, Gilead, and Merck have been leading the way in these acquisitions.

3. The Patent Cliff: The Driving Force Behind Corporate Acquisitions

The reason behind these aggressive acquisitions is the “patent cliff.” Patents protect drug companies’ products for a certain period, allowing them to charge higher prices and generate substantial profits. However, once patents expire, other companies can produce generic versions, causing sales to plummet for the original manufacturers.

It is estimated that by 2027-2028, nearly $180 billion in annual sales will come from drugs whose patents are about to expire. To mitigate this revenue shortfall, pharmaceutical companies need to invest in new drug development projects before these patents expire, ensuring a steady stream of income.

4. Cash Flow: Enough Money for Acquisitions?

Acquisitions require substantial financial resources. How do these giants afford them? They have ample cash flows. For example, Eli Lilly, thanks to its popular GLP-1 class weight loss drugs, has $7.27 billion in cash by the end of 2025. This year alone, it has made acquisitions worth over $35 billion, including purchases of cell therapy company Orna and anti-inflammatory drug company Ventyx.

Other giants are in a similar position, with sufficient cash and profit reserves to fund their M&A activities.

5. Future Trends: Will M&A Continue to Surge? Over $250 Billion by 2026?

Investment bank Stifel predicts that if current trends continue, the total value of M&A in the biopharmaceutical industry could exceed $250 billion by 2026. The pressure from the patent cliff will persist, and companies will need to continuously invest in new drug development. Additionally, with strong cash flows and fierce competition, M&A activity is likely to continue.

In summary, the current wave of biopharmaceutical M&A is not incidental but a necessary response to the patent crisis, and this trend is expected to last for several years.