第一财经

Promoting the High-Quality Development of Offshore Finance on the Track of the Rule of Law

原文:在法治轨道推进离岸金融高质量发展

Summary of Key Points

Offshore finance was once the preferred option for multinational corporations (especially Chinese internet companies) for overseas listings and wealth management due to its low-cost registration and information confidentiality. However, with the tightening of international regulations such as the Economic Substance Law, Global Minimum Tax, and CRS (Common Reporting Standard) agreements, the rules of these "tax havens" have been rewritten. China has also introduced four types of offshore account systems and clarified compliance requirements for cross-border guarantees, corporate structures going overseas, and resolution of jurisdictional conflicts. Enterprises and high-net-worth individuals need to re-evaluate their offshore frameworks and establish a solid compliance foundation to operate safely under the new regulations.

1. Offshore locations are no longer a haven for "shell companies" – Compliance requirements have significantly increased

In the past, registering a company in places like the Cayman Islands or BVI required simply filling out a form and paying a fee; there was no need for an actual office, and business owners' information could be kept hidden. But now that's not the case:

  • Economic Substance Laws require real operations: The Cayman Islands and BVI have enacted regulations stating that if your company engages in "related businesses" such as banking, fund management, or leasing, you must have an office locally, hire local employees, and conduct actual business activities. For example, a Cayman company must prove it has sufficient staff to handle its operations, while a BVI company must contribute to the local economy. Shell companies can face fines (Cayman: up to $12,000 in the first year; if not corrected within three years, the company will be deregistered; BVI: initial fine of $5,000 to $20,000, with a maximum of $200,000 for subsequent violations).
  • Global Minimum Tax eliminates zero-tax loopholes: Multinational companies with annual revenues over €750 million must pay at least 15% in tax regardless of where they are registered. If your offshore company only pays 5%, Chinese tax authorities have the right to require you to make up the difference.

Recommendation: Conduct a thorough review of your offshore companies immediately – do they engage in "related businesses"? Even if it's just a holding company, you should have basic office space and administrative staff. Either set up a local team or hire a compliance service provider.

2. China has four types of offshore accounts; choosing the wrong one could result in资金 freezes – Choosing the right account type is crucial

China has not copied foreign offshore models but created four different types of accounts, each with its specific use. Using the wrong one may lead to violations:

  • OSA Account: The most "pure" offshore account, which can only hold foreign currency and is used for funds coming in from and going out of China. It has loose regulations and functions similarly to a domestic account, suitable for purely overseas fund transactions (e.g., between overseas subsidiaries).
  • FT Account: An innovation in the Shanghai Free Trade Zone that allows both domestic and foreign currencies and has certain limits on usage. Suitable for offshore trade, leasing, and shipping activities.
  • NRA Account: An account opened by overseas institutions in Chinese banks, mainly for temporarily unused funds; it has the weakest offshore characteristics and the strictest regulations. Suitable for overseas companies to deposit money in China temporarily.
  • EF Account: An "upgraded" version of the NRA account from Hainan, modeled after Singapore and Dubai, allowing free transfers between this account and other types of accounts, with limited domestic access within the account's quota. Suitable for enterprises that want to benefit from Hainan's open policies.

Recommendation: Choose the account type based on your business needs: use OSA for purely overseas transactions, FT/EF for cross-border trade, and NRA for temporary fund storage. Selecting the wrong one may result in your funds being frozen.

3. Be careful with cross-border guarantees – Avoid these three common mistakes

Cross-border guarantees are a common method for enhancing credit when companies expand overseas, but one mistake can render them ineffective:

  • Domestic Guarantee for Overseas Loans: The most common type, but be cautious:

1. You must register with the foreign exchange authorities within 15 days of signing the contract; otherwise, the guarantee may be invalid.

2. The funds must be used for the debtor's legitimate business activities and cannot be used for fictitious trade arbitrage.

3. "Good Faith Agreements" (which seem supportive but are actually guarantees) are now regulated and must be treated as domestic guarantees.

  • Overseas Guarantee for Domestic Loans: Commonly used by foreign-funded or red-chip companies; pay attention to overseas compliance requirements (e.g., verify the legality of board resolutions from BVI companies; it's best to consult local lawyers).
  • **Other types of guarantees (mortgages, pledges, etc.): The validity of contracts depends on the law agreed upon, and the effectiveness of property rights depends on the law of the location of the assets.

Reminder: Supreme Court cases have made it clear that unregistered cross-border guarantees may be invalid; don't take chances.

4. Choose the right corporate structure for going overseas – Avoid these common pitfalls

There are various corporate structures for expanding overseas, but each carries risks:

  • ODI (Outward Direct Investment) Structured Approach: The most compliant method, where a domestic parent company registers and approves an overseas subsidiary through the National Development and Reform Commission, Commerce Department, and foreign exchange authorities. Avoid bypassing these procedures; otherwise, it may be considered "fake foreign investment," potentially resulting in the inability to repatriate profits or even tax evasion charges.
  • Red-Chip/VIE (Variable Interest Entity) Structures: Commonly used by internet companies for overseas listings (e.g., Cayman → Hong Kong → WFOE in China → VIE-controlled entity). Registration is now mandatory (9 VIE companies have been listed through this structure in 2025). Court cases suggest that disassembling a VIE may harm creditors' interests, and the Stock Exchange only allows its use when necessary.
  • Regional Headquarters Structures: Using Hong Kong or Singapore as intermediaries; be aware of tax authorities' checks on "economic substance" (e.g., whether there are actual offices, employees, and decision-making processes to avoid using shell companies for tax benefits).
  • Multi-layer Offshore Structures: Previously, nested structures like BVI within Cayman could isolate risks, but CRS and Global Minimum Tax regulations now allow for the identification of the ultimate beneficiary.

Recommendation: Prefer the ODI structured approach; ensure red-chip/VIE structures are registered in a timely manner; and make sure regional headquarters conduct actual business operations.

5. Resolve jurisdictional conflicts using the right rules – Avoid misunderstandings

Offshore finance involves different legal systems (common law, e.g., Cayman, Hong Kong, and civil law, e.g., China), which can lead to issues:

  • Contractual Agreement Priority: When signing cross-border contracts, try to specify that Chinese or Hong Kong law applies and choose a Chinese or Hong Kong arbitration institution for disputes (arbitration awards are more easily enforced internationally).
  • Use the Public Order Reservation Clause: If applying foreign law would harm Chinese interests, the court can apply Chinese law.
  • Arbitration as a preferred dispute resolution method: It's faster, cheaper, and more internationally recognized.
  • Seek professional assistance: The Shanghai Financial Court has a mechanism for quickly handling foreign-related disputes, which can help you understand foreign laws and resolve cross-border guarantee issues.

In summary: Offshore finance is no longer a place outside of legal regulations; compliance is the only way forward. Take these three steps immediately: review the economic substance of your offshore companies, complete any required foreign exchange registrations (e.g., according to Document No. 37), and optimize the legal and dispute clauses in your contracts.

This analysis breaks down complex offshore financial rules into understandable points to help you avoid risks and operate in compliance with regulations. Remember: In today's offshore finance world, the focus is no longer on tax avoidance but on compliance.