虎嗅

High-end ice cream too hard to cut? Mr. Wildman slams Häagen-Dazs!

原文:高端冰激凌割不动了?野人先生爆锤哈根达斯

Summary of Key Points

Hagen-Dazs was once the symbol of luxury ice cream, gaining nationwide popularity with the image of being a sign of affluence and sophistication, boasting 557 stores at its peak. However, today it has not only seen its number of stores halved but also had to resort to strategic partnerships to survive. This decline is the result of a combination of factors including changes in consumer attitudes, intensified market competition, lack of product innovation, an imbalance in cost-effectiveness, and outdated marketing strategies.

Detailed Analysis

1. The Loss of the “Sophisticated” Image: Young Consumers No Longer Buy for Prestige

In the past, buying Hagen-Dazs was more about showing off—holding a Hagen-Dazs cup during a date implied taste; giving it as a gift signified quality. But today’s younger generation is more practical, focusing on whether the ice cream tastes good, if the ingredients are healthy, and whether it’s worth the price. For example, a handmade ice cream for 20 yuan that uses high-quality ingredients and has a delicate texture might be considered a better value than Hagen-Dazs at 50 yuan. The notion of luxury that once made Hagen-Dazs successful is no longer appealing to rational consumers.

2. Intense Market Competition: Cornered by Competitors

Hagen-Dazs faces many competitors:

  • In the high-end market, there are established brands like GODIVA and newcomers like Maotai Ice Cream, which appeal to curious consumers with their unique flavors;
  • In the mid-range market, brands like Zhongxuegao and Menglong have gained popularity through social media marketing and offer comparable quality at lower prices;
  • In the low-end market, brands like Mixue Ice City offer affordable options that attract a wide audience. Hagen-Dazs is stuck in a middle ground, unable to compete with innovative high-end products or undercut by mid-range alternatives, nor can it appeal to the mass market.

3. Outdated Products: Stagnant Innovation

Hagen-Dazs has maintained its classic flavors (vanilla, chocolate, strawberry) for decades with little change. New products either lack distinctiveness or quickly disappear from the market. Consumers prefer variety and innovation—today they want low-sugar, low-fat options; tomorrow they might seek out unique flavors like Sichuan peppercorns or cilantro. Other brands have already launched plant-based ice creams (made with coconut milk or oat milk), while Hagen-Dazs is slow to follow. Limited collaborations with popular brands (such as Zhongxuegao and Luzhou Laojiao) also fail to generate significant interest.

4. Poor Cost-Effectiveness: High Prices Without Equivalent Value

Hagen-Dazs’ prices have remained high—35 yuan for a single scoop, 50 yuan for a small cup, and over 100 yuan for family sizes. However, consumers find that its ingredients are not significantly better than those of other brands, which use imported dairy and fresh fruits for just 20 yuan per scoop. Although Zhongxuegao is more expensive, its innovative products like “瓦片雪糕” (tile-shaped ice cream) offer a better value for money. Hagen-Dazs lacks what makes its price justified beyond its brand name.

5. Lagging Marketing: Out of Step with Young Consumers

Most Hagen-Dazs stores are located in shopping malls, which are seeing declining foot traffic. Youngers prefer online purchases or community-based retail options. The company’s online presence is weak, with high delivery fees and limited availability. Its marketing strategies (traditional TV ads and mall posters) do not engage with the popularity of social media and live streaming platforms. Brands like Zhongxuegao have successfully used these channels to gain widespread attention.

Hagen-Dazs’ decline reflects its failure to adapt to changes in the consumer market. When prestige is no longer a key factor in purchasing decisions, and when products, prices, and marketing strategies fall behind competitors, survival becomes difficult. Its story serves as a reminder to all established brands: without innovation and a connection with contemporary consumer trends, even the most classic brands can be left behind by the times.