虎嗅

"Tsinghua Graduation Photo: Is It Your Turn to Object, You 'Monster'?" *(Note: The translation adapts the tone of the original Chinese headline to a more humorous and conversational style suitable for an English financial news context.)*

原文:清华毕业照,轮到你这个妖怪来反对?

Summary of the Core Content

In a photo from the graduation ceremony of a department at Tsinghua University, a child appeared in the first row for two consecutive years. Netizens criticized this as a violation of rules and an example of privilege, but neither the graduates nor the teachers present saw anything wrong with it. The article argues that netizens are overstepping their bounds by taking issue on behalf of others, misinterpreting the context (confusing a university with a factory), and exaggerating the situation through online scrutiny, which ultimately led to the university deleting the photo and ruining the otherwise pleasant graduation memory. It urges people not to make a mountain out of a molehill and to let go of such trivial matters.

1. Netizens’ Sense of Righteousness: The Involved Have No Complaints

The whole incident started with netizens noticing a child in the first row of a graduation photo on the department’s official WeChat account and confirming that it was the same child from the 2025 photo. People who had nothing to do with Tsinghua University began to claim that this violated the rules of the graduation photos and was unfair to the graduates.

However, the key question is: Did the graduates or teachers object? No one did. Everyone thought there was nothing wrong with the photo—everyone was included, and the composition was clear and well-arranged. Netizens were acting as if they were defending someone else’s rights through the screen, but the child itself didn’t feel offended at all. Isn’t this a classic example of “the emperor isn’t worried, while the eunuchs are?”

2. “The First Row = Privilege?”: Netizens’ Anxiety About Rules Is Based on Their Own Imagination

The main issue for netizens was the child’s position in the first row; some even referred to it as a “prime spot” (although the child was actually just on the side, not in the center). They believed that the first row should be reserved for academicians and leaders. But is this really Tsinghua University’s rule? The article asks: Who does netizens think has the right to decide who should sit in the first row of a graduation photo? Since neither the teachers nor the graduates had any issues, why should an outsider who saw a screenshot have more knowledge about etiquette than the people involved? Moreover, the child’s position in the photo didn’t affect anyone; all the graduates were captured in the frame, and the ceremony proceeded as usual. Netizens’ reaction was disproportionate, reflecting a sense of vulnerability and perhaps even persecution complex.

3. Misconception: A University Is Not a Factory

Some netizens compared this situation to factory group photos, arguing that in a factory, it would be inappropriate for a leader’s child to sit in the first row. But a university is a community where teachers and students live together; it’s common for professors’ children to grow up on campus, use the facilities, and participate in activities. At Tsinghua University, even cats are allowed in classrooms (described as part of the “humanistic atmosphere”). So why would a professor’s child sitting in the first row of a graduation photo be considered a sign of privilege?

4. The Harm of Online Scrutiny: Trivial Matters Turning into Public Controversy

The worst aspect of this incident is not the photo itself, but the intense online criticism. Netizens took a screenshot of the department’s tweet about the photo, analyzed it in detail, and condemned Tsinghua University as if it had committed some serious offense. As a result, the university deleted the controversial photo to avoid further trouble. What should have been a simple graduation memory became tainted by controversy, and the child became the target of speculation (with some speculating about his background or even suggesting he might use the photo to gain advantages in the future). This kind of online scrutiny erodes trust between people and removes the warmth from social interactions. Do we really need to make every small issue a big deal to feel that we are acting “justly”?

In Conclusion: Some Things Can Be Let Go

The article concludes by suggesting that not everything needs to be taken so seriously. The presence of a child in a university graduation photo is a small, warm moment (such as a professor bringing his child to the ceremony, which reflects the university’s humanistic values). But netizens have turned it into a matter of privilege. When we focus on every detail through a magnifying glass, no one can be perfect; every explanation will be questioned. Instead of wasting energy on such trivial matters, we should focus on things that truly deserve our attention and not let online scrutiny destroy the small moments of warmth in our lives.