虎嗅

Behind the change in foreign brand names, there lies the transfer of power at China's dining tables.

原文:洋品牌改姓背后,中国餐桌上的权力交接

Summary of Key Points

Over the past year or so, Chinese capital has made significant acquisitions of foreign food and beverage brands such as Pizza Hut (Mainland China), Starbucks China, Burger King China, Blue Bottle Coffee Global, and Häagen-Dazs China. These acquisitions are different from previous ones in that Chinese investors have moved from being "agents" or "franchisees" to becoming "brand owners" or "absolute controllers." The reason behind this is that foreign brands are experiencing weak growth in the Chinese market and wish to offload their assets. Chinese capital not only has the financial resources but also the local operational expertise to take over these businesses, while the former's prestige is gradually fading. Once in control, Chinese teams begin to transform these brands using localized approaches, yet they face challenges such as balancing brand identity and generating profits in lower-tier markets. Essentially, this represents a reshaping of global business practices, with the rules of the Chinese consumer market increasingly being defined by the Chinese themselves.

Why Are Foreign Brands Urgently Selling Their Operations in China?

Foreign brands once thrived in China, but now they are facing difficulties:

  • Stagnant or declining growth: Burger King China's annual sales per store amount to only $400,000 (the lowest globally, less than 1/9 of France's); Häagen-Dazs China has closed nearly half of its stores in seven years (from 557 to 262); Starbucks China's market share has dropped from 42% to 14%.
  • Foreign giants don't want to carry heavy assets: Multinational companies are encountering growth bottlenecks in their diversified businesses, and the food and beverage sector is considered a "heavy asset, low-profit" industry that requires managing stores, supply chains, and labor, making it a priority for them to dispose of. For example, Yum Brands stated that "Pizza Hut might do better outside our structure," implying that they believe Chinese investors can manage the brand more effectively.
  • Fading brand prestige: Consumers once viewed foreign brands as premium, but now more people prefer Ruixing (9.9 yuan) over Starbucks (30 yuan). Foreign companies either have to struggle on their own or hand over decision-making power to Chinese teams that understand the local market, with most choosing the latter option.

Why Can Chinese Capital Take Over These "Big Names?"

It's not just about having money; it's about having both money and capability:

  • Ample funds: CPE Yuanfeng manages assets worth over 180 billion yuan, and Boyu Capital acquired Starbucks after obtaining a stake in Beijing's SKP. Dacheng Capital is backed by Ruixing.
  • Strong local operational skills: The fierce competition in the Chinese market has led to the development of unique strategies—such as Ruixing's digital ordering system and customer profiling, Mixue Ice City's cost-effective supply chain, and Yum Brands' standardized store management, as well as collaborative marketing initiatives (Ruixing × Moutai).
  • Understanding Chinese consumer needs: The chairman of CITIC Capital noted that the problem with foreign brands in China is their slow decision-making and lack of understanding of local consumers. Chinese teams can change this situation—for instance, Starbucks now hires Jay Chou as a spokesperson to appeal to younger customers.

How Are These Acquisitions Different from Previous Ones?

The role of Chinese capital has evolved three times:

1. 20 years ago: Foreign companies were in control, with Chinese partners helping to open stores and localize the brands (e.g., Starbucks initially granted franchises to Maxim's and Uni-President). However, foreign firms later retook control due to the importance of the Chinese market.

2. 10 years ago: Chinese companies became franchisees, such as Yum Brands' spin-off for Burger King China, which obtained a 50-year franchise fee (3% annually; in 2025, Yum Brands paid nearly 500 million yuan). McDonald's China was acquired by CITIC (under the name "Golden Arch"), but the brand remained under McDonald's ownership.

3. Now: Chinese companies are the owners or controllers: Yum Brands has purchased the rights to operate Pizza Hut in mainland China (no longer paying franchise fees); Burger King China is now fully controlled by CPE Yuanfeng (foreign investors have become "financial investors" only collecting licensing fees); Dacheng Capital has acquired Blue Bottle Coffee Global. This time, Chinese teams truly have the final say, making decisions without needing to report to foreign headquarters, which is much more efficient.

Challenges in Post-Acquisition Transformation:

Signing contracts is just the beginning; there are many hurdles to overcome:

  • Balancing brand identity and growth: Starbucks' efforts to diversify (e.g.,非遗-themed stores, collaborations with "Only This Green" series) aim to attract customers, but some worry that it might lead to a loss of its core "third-space" appeal. If it follows Ruixing's fast-paced consumer strategy, it could alienate its existing customer base.
  • Entering lower-tier markets is not easy: Starbucks aims to open 20,000 stores, but consumers in smaller cities are price-sensitive (Ruixing sells for less than Starbucks). Burger King needs to expand rapidly (275 stores per year), but its brand position is unclear—it's neither as upscale as Shake Shack nor can it compete with low-priced brands like Tastings and Wallace.
  • Operational challenges: For example, Starbucks is reducing full-time staff and shifts to cut costs, which may impact service quality. Burger King has recently closed stores; whether it can expand quickly remains uncertain.

The Underlying Reality: Who Really Controls the Business?

These acquisitions are not about foreign capital leaving China but about global business optimization:

  • Foreign investors: They want to divest from heavy assets to focus on higher-profit businesses (e.g., Nestlé selling Blue Bottle Coffee and focusing on its core products like milk powder and coffee).
  • Chinese capital: They use local expertise to revitalize these brands and make them more relevant in the Chinese market.
  • Changing rules: Previously, foreign brands set the rules, but now Chinese teams make decisions (e.g., Starbucks' spokesperson choices and Burger King's expansion plans).

However, the outcome is still uncertain. Whether these brands will thrive or decline depends on whether Chinese teams can balance growth with brand integrity and successfully enter lower-tier markets. One thing is clear: the power in the Chinese consumer market is now in the hands of the Chinese.

The transformation has begun; whether these brands will survive and succeed depends on their ability to navigate these challenges. In the next five years, we will see more foreign brands adapting to Chinese capital, either becoming more popular or disappearing. Regardless, the Chinese consumer market is increasingly being shaped by the Chinese themselves.