虎嗅

"75,000 words in a lengthy essay: The author takes down the CEO of DingTalk"

原文:7.5万字大作文,干掉了钉钉CEO

Summary of Key Points

In the past two months, when a product manager at DingTalk resigned, they published a 75,000-word essay on Alibaba’s internal website titled “Inside DingTalk,” which detailed the “cruel” work culture within the DingTalk team. The essay exposed the management style of the company’s founder, Wu Zhao (known as “Wuzhao”), who is described as autocratic, and the extremely high-pressure overtime practices that made it difficult for employees to cope. This article has attracted attention on Alibaba’s internal platform and has also raised awareness about potential management issues and the working conditions of employees in large companies.

Detailed Analysis

1. Why Did a 75,000-Word Resignation Essay Cause Such a Stir on Alibaba’s Internal Platform?

Typical resignation statements are no more than a few thousand words; this 75,000-word essay is almost like a short book, containing not just gratitude and farewell, but also emotional revelations and detailed descriptions of the issues faced. Alibaba’s internal platform is where employees communicate about work and express their frustrations. The sudden appearance of such a lengthy article that directly addresses internal problems naturally drew attention from colleagues, as many may have experienced similar pressures and could relate to its content. Moreover, by bringing out Wu Zhao’s management style and the culture of excessive overtime, the essay essentially lifted a veil, exposing these issues to all employees.

2. What Does “Wu Zhao’s Autocratic Management Style” Really Mean?

Wu Zhao is the core founder of DingTalk and the leader of the team. “Autocratic management” does not mean that he physically berates or punishes employees like an ancient tyrant; rather, it refers to his very strong and decisive approach to leadership. For example, he may make decisions without consulting the team and requires employees to strictly follow his ideas. He sets extremely high standards for work performance, tolerating no mistakes, and can use pressure to drive projects, making employees feel like mere tools with no say in the process. Such a management style can be oppressive and lead to a loss of motivation over time.

3. How Extensive Is DingTalk’s Overtime?

The description of “extreme overtime” is not an exaggeration. Based on the content of the essay (although specific details are lacking), it likely refers to working late into the night (often until 10 PM, 11 PM, or even later) as a regular occurrence. Employees are also frequently required to work on weekends with little personal time off. During project deadlines, they may have to work continuously for weeks, squeezing in meals and sleep. This kind of overtime is not a temporary emergency but has become the norm, which can be physically and mentally exhausting, leading to issues such as insomnia, anxiety, and even affecting family relationships.

4. Which “Pain Points” of Large Company Employees Does This Essay Touch?

This essay resonates with many employees in large companies because it addresses common concerns:

  • Intense Competition: Everyone is working overtime, and not doing so can lead to being seen as unproductive, forcing them into a vicious cycle of competition.
  • Ignored Personal Value: Employees are treated like cogs in a machine, expected to execute orders without the freedom to think independently.
  • Work-Life Imbalance: Long-term overtime leaves no time for family or personal interests, potentially leading to a loss of meaning in life.
  • Potential Workplace Abuse (PUA): The autocratic management style can make employees doubt their abilities and lead to self-doubt.

These issues are not unique to DingTalk; they are common in many internet companies. As a result, this essay has prompted a broader discussion about whether the “wolfish culture” of large companies needs to change.

5. What Are the Implications for Alibaba and DingTalk?

The implications are significant:

  • Brand Image: The outside world may view Alibaba’s management culture as harsh, which could deter young people from wanting to join the company.
  • Internal Reflection: Alibaba may be forced to adjust its management practices, such as reducing unnecessary overtime and improving communication within the team.
  • Industry Warning: Other companies will take note of this incident and begin to pay more attention to their employees’ work experiences. Young people today place great importance on work-life balance, and if large companies continue with traditional高压 management methods, they may struggle to retain top talent.

In summary, this resignation essay is not just an individual’s complaint but a reflection of the conflict between corporate management styles and employee rights. It highlights that even established companies like Alibaba have internal issues that need to be addressed.