第一财经

Title: "Vehicle and Ship Tax Revenue Growth Approaching Zero: What Will Be the Impact of Canceling Tax Incentives Next Year?" | Financial and Fiscal Insights

原文:车船税收入增速趋零,明年取消税收优惠有何影响|财税益侃

Summary of Key Points

Effective January 1, 2027, two preferential policies regarding vehicle and vessel taxes will be abolished: the first is the reduction of the tax on energy-efficient vehicles by half, and the second is the exemption from tax for pure electric commercial vehicles, plug-in (including range-extended) hybrid vehicles, and fuel cell commercial vehicles. The background for these policy changes is the continuous decline in the growth rate of vehicle and vessel tax revenues (which only increased by 0.3% in the first five months of 2026). This is due to the maturity of the new energy vehicle industry (with a penetration rate exceeding 50%), necessitating a balance between tax fairness and other considerations. The impacts include a noticeable increase in local fiscal revenue, although the tax burden on vehicle owners will rise slightly, it remains generally manageable. Pure electric passenger vehicles, however, will continue to enjoy the tax exemption.

Detailed Explanation

1. **Which preferential policies are being abolished, and who will be affected?**

Starting from 2027, the following types of vehicle owners will no longer benefit from tax incentives:

  • Energy-efficient vehicle owners: Fuel vehicles that previously met energy efficiency standards (such as those with displacements below 1.6L) could pay half the usual amount in vehicle and vessel taxes; now, they will have to pay the full amount.
  • Some new energy vehicle owners: Pure electric commercial vehicles (e.g., electric trucks), plug-in/hybrid vehicles (whether for personal or commercial use), and fuel cell commercial vehicles, which were previously exempt from tax, will have to pay the tax as usual.

Note: Pure electric passenger vehicles (ordinary household electric cars) will continue to be exempt from vehicle and vessel taxes, maintaining support for zero-emission vehicles.

2. **Why are these preferential policies being abolished?**

There are two main reasons:

  • Vehicle and vessel tax revenues are stagnating: This tax is an important source of revenue for local governments, used for purposes such as road construction and public services. However, the growth rate of these revenues has been slowing down in recent years, with only a 2.5% increase in 2024 and just 0.3% in the first five months of 2026. The reason is that over 80% of newly purchased vehicles are new energy vehicles (which are either exempt from tax or subject to reduced taxes), while the number of taxable fuel vehicles has not increased significantly, resulting in a smaller tax base. Additionally, the amount of vehicle and vessel tax is fixed (e.g., 300 yuan per year for 1.6L vehicles), so it does not increase with vehicle prices.
  • The new energy industry has matured and no longer requires special treatment: With a penetration rate of over 50%, new energy technology is well-established, and the market is widespread. Continuing to exempt plug-in hybrid vehicles (which can use fuel) from tax would be unfair to owners of traditional fuel vehicles. For example, in the case of household vehicles, plug-in hybrids can use fuel but do not pay tax, while fuel vehicles have to pay the full amount, creating a disparity.

3. **How much more will vehicle owners need to pay each year?**

Vehicle and vessel taxes are paid annually and are calculated based on the vehicle's displacement (with slight variations across regions):

  • Energy-efficient fuel vehicles: For example, vehicles with displacements below 1.6L, which previously paid half the tax, will now have to pay 600 yuan per year (an increase of 300 yuan).
  • Plug-in hybrid/pure electric commercial vehicles: Vehicles that were previously exempt from tax may now have to pay between 500 and 2000 yuan per year, depending on the vehicle size.

**It is important to note that the amount of vehicle and vessel tax is generally not high, so most owners will only need to pay a few hundred more dollars each year, which is manageable.”

4. **Why isn’t the policy a “one-size-fits-all” approach?**

This adjustment is targeted rather than comprehensive. The decision to retain the exemption for pure electric passenger vehicles supports their green and zero-emission transition. By abolishing the incentives for plug-in hybrid vehicles, it aims to promote tax fairness, as these vehicles can still use fuel and should not enjoy special treatment compared to traditional fuel vehicles. The policy also applies to existing vehicles; previously exempted plug-in hybrids will now be taxed, indicating a shift from supporting the new energy industry to a more reasonable tax system.

5. **What are the benefits for local finances?**

Vehicle and vessel taxes are local revenues. By abolishing these incentives, the number of taxable vehicles will increase (as previously exempted vehicles will now pay tax), leading to a noticeable rise in local fiscal revenue. For example, if revenue growth was previously only 0.3%, it could increase to 5%-10% after the changes, providing more funds for improving public services and infrastructure.

Conclusion

This adjustment in vehicle and vessel tax policies marks the transition of the new energy industry from being supported to being mature. It promotes tax fairness and helps supplement local finances without placing a significant burden on vehicle owners. After all, paying a few hundred more dollars each year means a more reasonable tax system and better-quality local services. Pure electric vehicle owners need not worry; their tax exemption will continue.