虎嗅

"Selling a car worth 200,000 yuan, the entire factory makes a net profit of no more than 3,000 yuan," Cui Dongshu says: The profit turning point for leading automakers may be in the fourth quarter. "Blood-thinning" competition is forcing cost restructuring, and inefficient models will be phased out."

原文:“卖一辆20万元的车,整车厂净赚不过3000元”,崔东树:头部车企的利润拐点或在四季度,“失血式”竞争倒逼成本重构,低效车型将被砍掉

Summary of Key Points

In the first half of 2026, China's automotive industry suffered significant losses: a car sold for 200,000 yuan only generated a profit of 3,000 yuan, with an industry profit margin of 3.4% (lower than the industrial average of 6.1%), and the profit margin for vehicle manufacturing was even at just 1.5%. Many mainstream automakers shifted from profitability to loss due to the combined pressures of soaring costs, brutal price wars, and investment in transformation. In the second half of the year, price wars are expected to subside, giving way to competition based on technology. Sales of fuel vehicles plummeted (by nearly 40% year-on-year in June), and joint-venture brands are facing difficulties due to their shortcomings in new energy technologies. Going global is a necessary strategy, but it should not be seen as a refuge; automakers need to avoid local competition overseas. They must streamline homogeneous new models and focus on niche markets with high demand.

I. Why Didn't Automakers Make Money in the First Half of the Year? Three Major Reasons for Losses

The collapse in automakers' profits was not accidental; three factors drained their earnings:

1. Costs Rose Faster than Revenue: Industry revenue increased by only 1.4%, while costs rose by 2.3%—due to higher prices of upstream materials like lithium carbonate and chips, as well as the inevitable expenses for researching and developing new energy and intelligent driving technologies.

2. Frenzied Price Wars: Fuel vehicle prices dropped by an average of 14.9% (some older joint-venture models saw reductions of over 20%) due to high inventory and low demand; new energy vehicles also experienced price cuts, with the A00 segment (microcars) being hit the hardest. Since costs couldn't be passed on to consumers, profits were significantly reduced.

3. Low Sales Magnified Losses: In the first quarter, early-year orders provided support, but by the second quarter, inventory buildup forced automakers to increase promotions, leading to further losses. For example, a car sold for 200,000 yuan might have costs of 197,000 yuan, leaving a profit of only 3,000 yuan—some models even resulted in losses.

II. Are Price Wars Ending? Moving from "Who's Cheaper" to "Who Has Better Technology" in the Second Half of the Year

The reckless price cuts of the first half are coming to an end, but they won't completely disappear:

  • Why the Change? The government has implemented measures to prevent unfair competition (such as checking for malicious price dumping), and the industry profit margin has fallen below a critical level (3.4%), making it unsustainable for automakers to continue losing money. The number of models with price cuts in June was half that of last year, indicating a clear shift.
  • How Will It Change? The focus of competition will shift from "who offers the lowest prices" to "who has the best technology." Low-end vehicles will see minor inventory reductions, mid-range models will compete on intelligent features (such as advanced driving systems and fast charging), while high-end models will maintain their brand premium. Leading automakers can reduce costs by 8,000-12,000 yuan per vehicle through platformization and scaling. Note: Price cuts will still occur for older inventory and microcars, but they won't be as extreme as in the first half.

III. The Decline of Fuel Vehicles: How Can Joint-Venture Brands Survive?

Fuel vehicle sales dropped by nearly 40% in June, with new energy penetration reaching 62.8%. Joint-venture brands are facing challenges on both fronts:

  • Current Situation: Their new energy penetration is only 11.9%, and fuel vehicles are their main source of revenue, but sales are declining, reducing their market share to less than 25%.
  • Three Survival Strategies:

1. Integrate Fuel and Electric Technologies: Upgrade fuel vehicles with intelligent infotainment systems and autonomous driving to narrow the gap with domestic brands.

2. Address New Energy Shortcomings: Quickly launch long-range hybrid and cost-effective electric vehicles to reduce reliance on fuel vehicles.

3. Target Niche Markets: Focus on segments like MPVs (business vehicles) and large-size fuel SUVs, avoiding the crowded markets dominated by domestic brands.

  • Warning: Relying solely on fuel vehicles will further erode their market share.

IV. Going Global Is Not a Refuge: It Needs to Be Done Right

Domestic competition is too intense, so going global is essential, but it shouldn't be a last resort:

  • Not the Only Solution: Global expansion can help increase sales and profits, but it won't solve issues with poor product quality or lack of core technologies. The domestic market remains a crucial platform for improving technology. Automakers should leverage both domestic and international resources.
  • Resource Allocation: Leading brands (like BYD) should allocate 60% of their efforts to the domestic market and 40% to overseas markets, building factories and research centers. Joint-venture brands should prioritize the domestic market (75%) with limited overseas expansion; export-oriented companies (like Chery) should distribute resources similarly.
  • Avoid Overseas Competition: Don't compete on low prices; instead, focus on localization (building factories, establishing supply chains), branding (creating high-end images), and building ecosystems (such as fast charging networks and after-sales services). For example, target high-end electric vehicles in Europe rather than just selling cheap microcars.

V. Too Many New Cars Every Day with No Sales Growth? Automakers Need to Cut Unprofitable Models

Over 3 new cars were launched daily in the first half of the year, but sales didn't increase due to product homogenization:

  • Why Poor Sales? 95% of new models are similar, which has bored consumers. They are waiting for better options, leaving new products competing for existing customers rather than expanding the market.
  • Adjustments Needed:

1. Eliminate Duplicated Models: Remove overlapping models and focus on popular segments such as A-class cars (sedans/SUVs) priced between 100,000-200,000 yuan and mid-to-large SUV/MPVs priced between 250,000-350,000 yuan.

2. Differentiate Products: Focus on unique selling points (such as exclusive platforms, fast charging, advanced driving systems).

3. Promote Best-Selling Models: Allocate marketing resources to these models to extend their lifecycle and reduce costs through scale.

In summary, the first half of the year was a difficult period for the automotive industry, but it's not a sign of long-term decline. As long as automakers can reduce costs, adopt new technologies, address new energy shortcomings, and approach global expansion strategically, profit margins will improve gradually. Leading domestic brands may see recovery by the fourth quarter, while joint-venture and smaller brands will take longer. For consumers, waiting for price cuts is unnecessary; they should look for better technology and value for money. For automakers, competing on price is ineffective; focusing on quality and strength is the key to success.