虎嗅

Ideal Turns Against Its Own Plans: NIO Doesn't Go For It, but Xiaomi Is Comparing Its Products to Xiangjie?

原文:理想反水,蔚来不做,小米对标问界?

Summary of Key Points

Range-extended electric vehicles (EREVs) once took six years to go from being criticized as a niche technology to becoming a mainstream force in the Chinese automotive market. However, with advancements in pure electric technology (faster charging and improved range), their competitive edge has weakened, leading to a continuous decline in sales. In 2026, 54 new EREV models are set to be launched, pushing the market into a “survivor’s game” where only a few models can maintain monthly sales of 5,000 units. The market is polarizing between two main approaches: focusing on cost-effectiveness or providing a high-end experience. In the future, EREVs are expected to account for around 15% of the new energy vehicle market share, with only the leading players and those that can cater to specific consumer needs (such as areas with limited charging infrastructure or overseas markets) surviving.

Why Have EREVs Suddenly Become Less Popular?

The popularity of EREVs stemmed from their ability to address the shortcomings of pure electric and hybrid vehicles:

  • Pure electric vehicles had limited range and slow charging times, causing concerns about running out of battery during long journeys.
  • Hybrid vehicles experienced discomfort due to the poor smoothness when switching between the engine and the electric motor.

EREVs offered a compromise: they could run on electricity (saving money and providing a smoother ride) when there was sufficient charge and use gasoline to generate power when needed, eliminating these issues. However, with rapid advancements in pure electric technology:

  • High-voltage 800V charging systems have become more affordable, allowing for quick charges that can replenish 30%-80% of the battery’s capacity in just 20 minutes, making them as efficient as refueling.
  • Battery ranges have also increased significantly, largely alleviating range anxiety.

Without these advantages, EREV sales have plummeted, dropping by about 25% year-on-year in May and June, and by 13% overall from January to June, with their market share shrinking to just 6.4%.

Current Situation: Falling Sales and a Surfeit of New Models

The EREV market is facing both declining demand and an influx of new models:

  • Declining sales: Few models can maintain stable monthly sales of 5,000 units. For example, the Li Auto L series sold fewer than 10,000 units in June, despite being a major player before.
  • Surfeit of new models: 54 new EREV models are planned for 2026, many of which were developed during the initial boom. With the market shrinking, these models are competing for a limited share.

Even companies like Great Wall and NIO have stated they will no longer focus on EREVs due to diminishing profits. The competition now revolves around price and suitability for specific use cases, making it increasingly fierce.

Why Do Some Companies Still Invest in EREVs?

Despite the overall decline, there are still specific consumer needs that EREVs meet:

  • Areas with limited charging infrastructure: Regions like the northeast and northwest of China have cold winters that reduce battery range, and EREVs, which do not rely on charging, are more practical.
  • Overseas markets: Companies like Li Auto and Zero Run have seen a 266% increase in exports to countries like the UAE and Saudi Arabia, where gasoline is cheaper and charging infrastructure is scarce.
  • High-end market demands: Brands like Xiaomi aim to offer EREVs as alternatives to pure electric SUVs/MPVs for users who want a high-end experience but do not prefer all-electric vehicles. Joint ventures with traditional automakers (such as Volkswagen and Toyota) also see potential in this niche.

In summary, EREVs are no longer universally popular; they have evolved into a solution for specific consumer groups.

Market Polarization: Two Clear Paths

The EREV market has divided into two distinct approaches:

1. Cost-effectiveness: Models like Zero Run target the mid-to-low-end market, using proprietary technology to reduce costs and attract budget-conscious users with limited access to charging facilities.

2. High-end experience: Brands like Li Auto and Xpeng focus on large SUVs/MPVs, offering EREVs as a complement to pure electric vehicles for those who need long-distance travel while maintaining a premium experience.

Only those that can excel in one of these areas will thrive in the future market: either by providing unparalleled cost-effectiveness or an unrivaled user experience.

Who Will Survive?

In the future, EREVs are likely to account for around 15% of the new energy vehicle market share. The following types of companies are likely to succeed:

  • Leading brands: Those with established customer bases and technological capabilities, such as Li Auto (high-end experience), Xpeng (cost-effectiveness), and Zero Run.
  • Companies targeting specific markets: Those specializing in overseas markets or cold regions with limited charging infrastructure.
  • Technologically innovative companies: Those that can improve the efficiency of EREVs (e.g., by using faster charging technologies).

In conclusion, EREVs will not disappear, but their role will shift from being a mainstream option to a niche solution for specific consumer needs. Only those that truly address user pain points will remain competitive in the market.