第一财经

US and Saudi Arabia sign nuclear energy deal worth tens of billions of dollars: 30-year cooperation framework, with US companies leading the construction

原文:美国沙特签订数百亿美元核能协议:30年合作框架,美企主导建设

Summary of Key Points

The United States and Saudi Arabia have signed a 30-year, multi-billion-dollar civil nuclear energy cooperation agreement. The main terms include the possibility that Saudi Arabia will build uranium enrichment facilities on its own soil in the future (subject to joint determination by both countries); the verification process will be conducted by a U.S.-led team rather than the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); and the agreement requires Trump to issue a national security exemption order to proceed. Congress has 90 days to review the deal, but the president has the power to veto any opposition. Traditional U.S. nuclear companies such as Westinghouse Electric will benefit from this agreement. However, the U.S. nuclear energy supply chain has already shrunk, and the deal has sparked debates regarding nuclear proliferation risks and setting a new precedent for verification processes.

The Two Most Sensitive Issues in the Agreement: Uranium Enrichment and Exclusive U.S. Verification

Uranium enrichment is a dual-use technology; civilian nuclear power plants only require low-enriched uranium (3%-5%), but enrichment to over 90% can be used for nuclear weapons. The agreement allows Saudi Arabia to build such facilities, raising concerns about whether it may covertly increase the enrichment level to develop nuclear weapons.

The verification method is also unique: while typically, civilian nuclear projects are supervised by the IAEA to ensure compliance with non-nuclear weapon regulations, this agreement stipulates that sensitive inspections will be carried out by a U.S.-led team. This arrangement could be seen as favoritism towards Saudi Arabia, potentially leading other countries (such as Iran) to request similar exemptions from IAEA oversight, which could undermine global nuclear non-proliferation efforts.

The Process for Implementing the Agreement: Trump’s Exemption Order is Crucial

Since the agreement bypasses IAEA verification, it violates standard U.S. legislation, and therefore Trump must issue a national security exemption order for it to take effect. Congress will have 90 days to review it, but even if it votes against the deal, Trump can veto it, giving the president final authority.

U.S. Companies as Major Winners: Westinghouse Electric Receives a Significant Contract

The agreement prioritizes the use of U.S. suppliers:

  • Westinghouse Electric: The large-scale light-water reactors to be built in Saudi Arabia will be designed and manufactured by Westinghouse, which could mark a comeback for this established nuclear company after facing financial challenges due to project overruns.
  • Other U.S. companies involved in uranium mining and reactor component manufacturing will also benefit from the agreement, gaining a competitive advantage.

Controversy Over the Agreement: Nuclear Proliferation Risks and a Bad Precedent

Opposition to the deal focuses on several issues:

1. Nuclear proliferation risks: If Saudi Arabia acquires uranium enrichment capabilities, it could disrupt the nuclear balance in the Middle East, potentially prompting other countries (such as Iran) to follow suit.

2. Setting a bad precedent: If the U.S. allows Saudi Arabia to avoid IAEA verification, other nations may demand similar exemptions, potentially undermining the global nuclear non-proliferation framework.

3. Congressional Discontent: Democratic Senator Sherman criticized the agreement for not being approved by Congress, noting it violates the legislation he previously promoted to ban the provision of nuclear weapons to Saudi Arabia. Republican Senator Kennedy also expressed concerns about the potential impact on regional power dynamics if Saudi Arabia develops uranium enrichment capabilities.

Challenges for the U.S. Nuclear Energy Supply Chain

The U.S. nuclear energy industry has been in decline, with many projects experiencing cost overruns and delays (for example, a project that was budgeted at $10 billion ended up costing over $20 billion). The agreement’s emphasis on using U.S. suppliers raises doubts about whether the U.S. can supply sufficient materials and components on time. Sources suggest that the agreement does not explicitly prohibit Saudi Arabia from seeking assistance from other countries, indicating that the U.S. is not confident in its own ability to meet the requirements.

In summary, while the agreement represents a win-win situation for both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia (with the U.S. selling technology and revenue and Saudi Arabia gaining nuclear capabilities), it carries significant risks related to nuclear proliferation and challenges to global nuclear governance. The success of the agreement will depend on Trump’s exemption order and subsequent congressional negotiations.