虎嗅

Why were Brazil's payment fees once so high, and why haven't they decreased? The solution to Pix’s challenges

原文:巴西支付为什么曾经贵还降不下来?-Pix的破局之道

Summary of the Key Points

Payment services in Brazil used to be outrageously expensive due to a monopoly held by card-based payment systems (credit cards/debit cards), with merchants having to pay around 2% in fees. Consumers, relying on credit cards, had no other options. This was not due to a lack of competition but rather because vested interests such as banks and card organizations deliberately maintained high prices. Debit cards were neglected, traditional transfers were restricted, and a complex web of stakeholders conspired to keep prices high. High inflation also contributed to the culture of using installment payments, leading to market inefficiencies. It was not until the Brazilian Central Bank introduced the national instant payment system Pix that the monopoly was broken. Pix offers free, immediate, and low-cost account-to-account transfers, forcing traditional payment methods to lower their fees. This has not eliminated credit cards but given consumers and small businesses more choices, resulting in a win-win situation for all.

Why Are Brazilian Payment Services So Expensive?

The main reason for the high costs is not a lack of competition but rather an intentional restriction on cheaper alternatives:

  • Card-based payments are the only viable digital option: Cash lacks traceability, traditional transfers (TED/DOC) are expensive and time-consuming, and paper-based payments are inconvenient. Merchants have no choice but to use credit cards or debit cards.
  • Banks are reluctant to promote cheaper alternatives: Debit cards are low-cost but not profitable (no interest or installment fees), so banks fear they will compete with credit card sales. Traditional transfers are limited to working days and amounts, making them less attractive.
  • A complex web of stakeholders raises prices together: The four major banks act as issuers, acquirers, and shareholders of card organizations. Lowering fees would reduce their income, so no one wants to be the first to do so. Even if individual parties lower their fees, it doesn't help since every link in the chain takes a cut.
  • The installment payment culture traps consumers: High inflation in the past (CPI of 2949% in 1990) has made Brazilians accustomed to using installment plans. Locking in prices before making payments allows them to save money due to currency devaluation, making credit cards indispensable for merchants.

What Is Pix?

Pix is not a product of a company but a public payment infrastructure built by the Brazilian Central Bank, essentially creating a “free and fast highway” for all users:

  • How to use it: Users set up their Taxpayer Identification Number (CPF), phone number, email, or a random code as a Pix key. They can then transfer money or receive payments by scanning a QR code or entering the key.
  • Advantages: ① Free: No fees for personal transfers; ② Immediate: Funds are transferred within 10 seconds, 24/7; ③ Low cost: Merchants only pay an average of 0.22% in fees (one-tenth of credit card fees); ④ Easy to use: Small vendors can receive payments by printing a QR code.

How Does Pix Break the Monopoly?

Pix's strategy is not to replace traditional payment methods but to introduce a better alternative, forcing competition:

  • Cost reduction: Merchants that use Pix pay only 0.22% in fees, and small businesses avoid costly POS machines. Personal transfers are free, making Pix more attractive to users.
  • Efficiency improvement: Transfers are immediate, covering all scenarios where cash or paper-based payments were used (buying coffee, paying bills, online shopping).
  • Monopoly disruption: The central bank requires large financial institutions to use Pix, unifying technical standards and turning the payment infrastructure from a private monopoly into a public platform. This forces traditional card organizations and banks to lower their fees (e.g., to around 1.5%).
  • Credit cards are not eliminated: Pix targets small, instant payments (like buying coffee), while credit cards remain for larger transactions (like buying phones). Both coexist, providing more choices for consumers and businesses.

The Brilliance of Pix

The real insight from Pix is the role of the central bank:

  • Public goods approach: The central bank treats payment infrastructure as a public service, not a profit-making tool. It builds the system and sets rules to ensure free or low-cost access for all.
  • No disruption to the existing ecosystem: Pix doesn't eliminate credit cards but forces them to improve their services (e.g., by offering installment options) to remain competitive.
  • Price benchmarking: Pix’s free and immediate service shows consumers that payments can be cheaper, motivating traditional providers to lower their fees and improve their services.

The Lesson: Who Should Own Payment Infrastructure?

Pix demonstrates that payment services are a fundamental public good, not just a business. In Brazil, high costs were due to private entities treating them as profit centers. The success of Pix shows that when the central bank takes control and makes it a public asset, competition is stimulated. This suggests that in cases of market failure (where vested interests lock out choices), the central bank should build public infrastructure rather than rely on subsidies or orders. Only then can effective competition be achieved.

In summary, Pix has transformed payment services in Brazil by providing a cheaper, more efficient, and inclusive solution, benefiting both consumers and small businesses. It also shows that good public policy creates new possibilities for society.